Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    6 big Canada Pension Plan changes arrive in 2012

    Last week in a speech in Davos, Switzerland, Prime Minister Stephen Harper lit a political powder keg when he hinted at possible changes to Old Age Security benefits. He was quick to point out that the Canada Pension Plan is "fully funded, actuarially sound and does not need to be changed," but a close look at the plan shows some alterations to the CPP are already underway.

    The rules governing the Canada Pension Plan are updated regularly, but most years the changes are limited to simple increases to benefit payments and premiums. Not this year.

    Ottawa is bringing in a raft of new or tweaked policies to reflect that retirement these days is more of a gradual transition for many people rather than a single event. Many of these changes either begin in 2012 or are entering the next phase-in period, and they'll have a direct impact on the retirement plans of Canadians.

    In some cases, the changes are big enough that people nearing retirement may want to have a chat with a financial adviser before deciding exactly when to apply for a CPP retirement pension.

    The first change involves payment rates.

    People can choose to take a CPP retirement pension as early as age 60. But there's a catch – a 0.5 per cent reduction in the pension payout for each month before age 65 that someone begins receiving it. That translates into a retirement benefit that's 30 per cent less at age 60 than it would be if you waited until 65.

    Starting in 2012, Ottawa is beginning to phase in a bigger reduction to get that early access.

    For 2012, the penalty rises to 0.52 per cent per month – or a 31.2 per cent reduction for someone who starts receiving the retirement pension at age 60.

    The early-bird reduction will continue to rise until 2016, when it hits 0.6 per cent per month, or a maximum 36 per cent reduction for those who start receiving CPP payments at age 60 rather than waiting until they reach 65.

    Similarly, those who wait until after the age of 65 to start collecting CPP will get a bigger increase in their retirement benefit.

    Before 2011, the rules stated that the CPP retirement benefit was boosted by 0.5 per cent for each month after age 65 that an individual put off receiving it. So someone who waited until age 70 would enjoy a 30 per cent boost in their payments.

    But starting in 2011, the government began to phase in a gradual increase to that delay bonus.

    For 2012, the increase for each month after 65 that a person delays applying for CPP goes to 0.64 per cent – or a maximum increase of 38.4 per cent for those who start receiving a pension at age 70. By 2013, the maximum bonus moves to 42 per cent.

    These changes won't affect people who are already receiving CPP benefits. They are being made, according to Service Canada, to restore these adjustments to "actuarially fair levels," so there are "no unfair advantages or disadvantages to early or late take-up of CPP retirement benefits."

    Canadians currently don't need to contribute to the CPP every year from age 18 to age 65 to get a full CPP retirement pension. When someone's average earnings over their contributory period are calculated, 15 per cent of their lowest earning years are automatically ignored when the calculation is made. For someone who takes their CPP retirement pension at age 65, that means seven years of low or zero earnings are dropped from the equation.

    But starting in 2012, that "general drop-out provision," as it's called, goes up to 16 per cent.

    For someone eligible for CPP benefits in 2012, that will allow up to 7.5 years of the lowest earnings to be excluded from the calculations, boosting the retirement benefit paid.

    In 2014, the percentage will rise again to 17 per cent, which will allow up to eight years of low earnings to be dropped.

    These changes can really benefit people who entered the workforce late, who were unemployed for a long time, or took time off to go back to school.

    One point to note is that there are separate drop-out provisions specifically for time spent out of the workforce because of disability or to have children.

    CPP rules used to require that someone stop or drastically reduce the amount they earned during the two consecutive months before they began to receive a CPP retirement pension.

    This was, for many Canadians, an annoying and costly requirement — especially since so many people now ease into retirement instead of stopping work completely.

    Now, that rule is history. Beginning in 2012, the "work cessation test" has been eliminated.

    There's another rule change that's important for semi-retirees to be aware of. Before 2012, if someone started receiving a CPP retirement pension early — say, at age 62 — they didn't have to make any CPP contributions if they decided to collect payments but also keep working after age 62.

    Starting this year, if you are under age 65 and continue to work while also drawing a retirement pension, you and your employer must make CPP contributions.

    The good news for employees is that these extra contributions will be credited to what's called a Post-Retirement Benefit (PRB), which will result in a higher CPP retirement pension in the year after you make contributions to your PRB. This measure is a nod to the reality that many "retired" Canadians are still working.

    Canadians who continue working after age 65 and are receiving a retirement benefit will have the choice of whether or not they want to make CPP contributions. If they choose to make them, their employer must kick in their share too. Those additional contributions will go toward higher benefits beginning the year after the PRB contributions.

    CPP benefits are always adjusted to reflect the rising cost of living. For 2012, the increase in benefits is 2.8 per cent. That will bring the maximum monthly CPP retirement pension to $986.67.

    Contribution rates are unchanged. But since the yearly earnings maximum that the rate applies to is going up, the maximum annual contribution will rise by about $89 in 2012 to $2,306.70 for both employees and employers.

    What do you feel about this article?

     
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Kelowna, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      Ottawa should start with the Blood sucking ex Members of Parlement, the currant ones should have to wait till 67, like the rest of us. Provincil MP's have been ripping us of since day one.
      • shazaad 3 months ago
        politicians on the whole have been ripping us off, not just provincial mp's. And one thinks these people are on our side! I wonder when stephen harper will start to collect 'his' pension and be utterly useless to canada? i think it would be soon. parasites, the whole lot of them.
      • Mink 3 months ago
        Politicians should not be allowed to collect gvernment pensions...just like olg employees can collect the lottery. The members of parliment suck enough of out of the taxpayers pockets as it is, they shouldn't be allowed to suck more from us when they retire....
      • Marie 3 months ago
        It appears WE, the taxpayers, are the only ones that know of the bloodsuckers. We are expected to work harder and longer to ensure their comforts and luxuries.

        I agree, Mink, they should not be allowed to collect - it's all double dipping to them. It's bad enough the islams/muslims/asians only have to spend two years here to collect OUR money while we are forced to work 50+ years to collect.

        Harper has done enough damage and unless he's stopped by the taxpayers, he will destroy more. Canada will no longer be Canada ...
    • Lancer  •  3 months ago
      No one should be allowed to collect either C.P.P., or O.A.P. with the present allowable income levels. At over $112.000 per year, O.A.S. is not paid. WELL I GUESS NOT !
      Try lowering the income limits way down and we won't have a problem. Always dumped on the poor to protect the rich. That's going to change when 'real Canadians' hear more of this. Harper, you don't have my vote anymore and how many others?
      • Rick 3 months ago
        Just stop filing your taxes as your no longer required to do so read the Charter section 52 It tells us that the Charter is the Supreme law in all of Canada and there for all other laws fall under the charter and then go to section 32 which tells you who the charter applies to .......... Gov`t and its employees so now the courts must show and prove you are acting as an agent of the Government and if they can prove that then you can send them a bill for acting as a tax collection agent for the Gov`t
      • Mink 3 months ago
        I agree, too many high income earners collecting OAS and GIS and CPP...and they find all kinds of creative ways to hide their income and split it with spouses, etc....the government pensions should be for the low income earners in retirement, not for rich businessmen who get rich by finding corrupt ways to hide their income and get money from the government.
    • Elaine  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Will the MP's be exempt from these changes? Or do the changes apply only to the rest of us? With their platinum pensions they don't need either CPP or OAS. This is a case of "Some pigs are more equal than others".
      • Jackyll 3 months ago
        Apparently, the Gov't boys are suppose to take cuts too ... how much ... is left to be seen. I doubt that any cuts will barely make a dent in what they receive. I would like for all the former MPs to have to take a large decrease in their pension pay outs too. Many of them still work i.e. Lloyd Axeworthy (U of Winnipeg), Alan Rock (U of Toronto) and many others. They have incomes plus pensions (double dipping) and THAT just murders the pension plans.
    • spawatson  •  Woodstock, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      I don't mind paying if I'm working and collecting cpp, but as for the rest nope. The government as far as I'm concerned is trying to make people work longer, glad I took mine out at 60. Rather enjoy whats left of my life instead of working everyday 9 to 5 two shifts or midnights.
      • D H 3 months ago
        Hey Generation useless, why don't you get busy dying so the rest of us can get on with putting this mess of a country back together after a@@holes like you bled it dry. I can't wait for the boomers to die off and stop screwing up the vote.
      • Violet 3 months ago
        My family doctor if 78 and still working. He looks so young, funny and very energetic. I won't retire at 60, I am running my own business and I am too happy to give up. I will just take a longer vacation twice a year.
      • Violet 3 months ago
        DH - not many boomers will retire, believe me.
    • Toronto  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Every politician should receive their pensions when they hit 65, not after serving 7 years in office. Also if the CPP increase the penalties, so should the politicians including increasing their retirement to age 67.
      • Richard C. 3 months ago
        The real question is how politicians can increase their pensions while double-dipping with appointments to the public service like ambassadors, council heads, institute presidents, etc. Its going to be tricky.
      • lilac 3 months ago
        i don't give damn about politicians
      • Snake 3 months ago
        you give up a lot to be part of the govt. of course that would not occur to any of you!
    • Jean-Marie  •  Fort St John, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      maybe it's time to shut Canada down like the the rest of the world, and bring this government to reality, they don't deserve a better pension the the rest of us, we have to work 50 yrs for a 500.00 a month pension, and they get 5,000 a month and more for 6 yrs of service, BS on this garbage
    • Cliff  •  Truro, Nova Scotia  •  3 months ago
      CHANGE THE SWEET DEALS FOR THE POLITIANS AND CIVIL SERVANTS FIRST,!
      let the public deceide on what changes are fair,,,,,, hummmmm warships or pensions???
    • Mel  •  3 months ago
      SORRY FOLKS, BUT I REALLY AM YELLING HERE:
      STOP PAYING GUARANTEED SUPPLEMENT TO PEOPLE WHO QUALIFY FOR A PARTIAL OLD AGE SECURITY BASED ON A "RECIPROCAL" AGREEMENT WITH COUNTRIES. EX. SOMEONE OVER 65 IS SPONSORED BY THEIR FAMILY, LIVES HERE A COUPLE OF YEARS AND CAN GET AN OAS PENSION OF ABOUT $14/MO. FOR EACH YEAR OF RESIDENCE. THEN IF THEY CLAIM THEY HAVE NO OTHER INCOME, THEY CAN RECEIVE GIS OF OVER $1000 PER MONTH!!! WHY DO THEY NEED THIS?? THEY WERE SPONSORED! THEY LIVE WITH THEIR CHILDREN SO HAVE VERY LITTLE EXPENSE. THEIR CHILDREN HAVE FREE BABY SITTING SO THEY SAVE ON THAT. BASICALLY THEY (ACTUALLY WE) ARE PAYING THE MORTGAGE FOR THEIR CHILDREN. MANY, IF THEY DON'T LIKE IT HERE OR CAN'T STAND THE WINTERS, GO "HOME" AND THE CHEQUES KEEP COMING. SOMEONE WHO HAS WORKED, CONTRIBUTED AND MANAGES TO GET A LITTLE INTEREST ON SOME MEASLEY SAVINGS WILL NOT QUALIFY FOR THE GIS. NOW YOU KNOW WHY I YELLED - I'M ANGRY!
    • Janice Mundy  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      The present monthly CPP pension is $986.67? Right now I am paying $900 a month for rent. If I was retired, that would only leave me $86.67 to pay all my bills, transportation, food, etc. That's not enough!! How do they expect people to live on such a small amount of money? If you don't make enough to save any money now, you have to keep working after age 65.
    • picton lad  •  Kingston, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Before hitting the average work person(s) MPP should reduce there pensions In the real world one does not get a full pension for working just a few years like MPP,s prior to the last election the harper government were talking of incresing old age pensions. but since then all they have talked abpout is cutting back. How does he think people are going to live.
    • MR V  •  London, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      How about changing those fat pensions from those FAT MP's ps I can balance the budget in a week . its calleds comen sence.
    • Brian W  •  Winnipeg, Manitoba  •  3 months ago
      When the highest unemployment rate is in the 25 and under age group, why aren't we encouraging people to retire earlier! If they CHOOSE to survive on a reduced CPP, or aren't forced to wait till 67 ,and have good RRSP funds, then let them retire earlier and then there will be more jobs for the YOUTH...and then they will be paying taxes and contributing to CPP and the economy ... What am I missing?
    • Jack Beleutz  •  London, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Its time for Canadians to stand up for our rights, If this government of ours stopped giving billiuons of our dollars to foreign countries, stopped wasting our tax money on on stupid ventures, and started looking after the seniors who contributed all those years. Income tax was brought in to fund the war, and now we are raped every day by usless politicians that wast our money. Our seniors are treated worse than immigrants, at least they get more tax free money from our government and free education, and never contributed a nickle. Its time for reform. I wish we could overthrow the government and get rid of all of them.
    • Catprincess  •  Montreal, Quebec  •  3 months ago
      Did you know that people on WELFARE (and old people that immigrate to Canada) that have NEVER worked in Canada in their life get the same pension as us who DO WORK?? How fair is that?????
    • anonymouse  •  3 months ago
      We find this out AFTER we elected them? OHMY. Can hardly wait for the next election - oh yes, but by then this will all be carved in stone, won't it?
    • COOL HAND  •  3 months ago
      ALL IS FINE AS LONG THEY IN OTTAWA KEEP TAKING FROM TAX PAYERS TO PUT IN THERE OWN POCKETS WE ARE SO STUPID TO KEEP TAKING THIS CRAP.
    • Sweet Pea  •  Montreal, Quebec  •  3 months ago
      Some of us that have worked hard all our lives will be lucky to even receive a pension even though we contribute to the plan. But the senators and politicians will get one for sure and much much more than any tax payer will. Now they want us to sit and beg and jump through hoops. Try getting rid of the senate before you pinch pennys at the tax payers expense.
    • Guy C  •  Brandon, Manitoba  •  3 months ago
      I wonder if an MP could live on $986.67 a month. Goddam blood suckers and thieves they are!
    • haypat  •  3 months ago
      How about voting so that when you complain it acutally means something!!!
    • Tom w  •  Calgary, Alberta  •  3 months ago
      Harper will try to cut the average guys pension so old people will be forced to go back to work to stay alive
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]

    News for You

    • Wrong man was executed in Texas, probe says
      Wrong man was executed in Texas, probe says

      He was the spitting image of the killer, had the same first name and was near the scene of the crime at the fateful hour: Carlos DeLuna paid the ultimate price and was executed in place of someone else in Texas in 1989, a report out Tuesday found.

    • Sunday Solar Eclipse Visible from National Parks
      Sunday Solar Eclipse Visible from National Parks

      When the sun vanishes behind the moon for the first time over the United States in this century, what better place to enjoy the view than from one of the 154 national parks that stand in its path?

    • Dancing With The Stars Elimination Surprise: Which Couple Didn't Make The Finals?
      Dancing With The Stars Elimination Surprise: Which Couple Didn't Make The Finals?

      "Dancing with the Stars" kicks off its Season 14 finals next week - and in a surprising twist, Katherine Jenkins will be among those competing for mirrorball glory.(SPOILER: This story contains the elimination news from Tuesday's "DWTS.")

    • Sugar can make you dumb, US scientists warn
      Sugar can make you dumb, US scientists warn

      Eating too much sugar can eat away at your brainpower, according to US scientists who published a study Tuesday showing how a steady diet of high-fructose corn syrup sapped lab rats' memories.

    • Mladic taunts survivors at start of genocide trial
      Mladic taunts survivors at start of genocide trial

      THE HAGUE (Reuters) - Bosnian Serb general Ratko Mladic made a throat-slitting gesture to a woman who lost her son, husband and brothers in the Srebenica massacre at the start of his trial on Wednesday for some of the worst atrocities in Europe since World War Two. Mladic, now 70, flashed a defiant thumbs-up as he entered the courtroom - the last of the main protagonists in the Balkan wars of the 1990s to go on trial at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague.  …

    • Illinois bride found stabbed to death in wedding gown

      CHICAGO (Reuters) - A bride still dressed in her wedding gown was found stabbed to death in the bathtub of her suburban Chicago apartment, authorities said on Monday. The body of the victim, 25-year-old Estrella Carrera of Burbank, Illinois, was discovered by police officers sent to her home to check on her on Sunday, a day after she was due to pick up her two young children from a relative, police said. ...

    • Finding God -- or maybe just comfort -- in candy
      Finding God -- or maybe just comfort -- in candy

      Can a lollipop wrapped in a Bible verse help people come to Jesus? Can a piece of chocolate bring a moment of bliss? Or how about just a bit of comfort after a bad day?

    Search