Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    New Alzheimer's Criteria Would Change Diagnosis for Millions

    Almost everyone currently diagnosed with a mild form of Alzheimer's disease would be downgraded to not having the condition, if new proposed criteria for the diagnosis of cognitive problems were applied, a new study shows.

    Instead, people diagnosed as having "very mild" and "mild" Alzheimer's disease would be reclassified as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which is currently recognized as an intermittent stage between the normal loss of mental function that comes with age and the development of dementia.

    The new criteria broaden the definition of mild cognitive impairment, and this will cause confusion when doctors try to diagnose MCI and Alzheimer's, said study researcher Dr. John Morris, a professor of neurology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.

    Moreover, the new criteria highlight the fallacy of thinking about MCI and Alzheimer's as different entities, Morris said.

    "[The] idea that there is an MCI stage, distinct from very early Alzheimer's disease, is artificial," Morris said. "It really is the same disease process."

    Instead of widening the criteria so more people are diagnosed with MCI, researchers should do the opposite — try to figure how to winnow down the group of patients with MCI to find those who will go on to develop Alzheimer's disease, Morris said. In fact, if a patient's memory and thinking troubles are due to early Alzheimer's, and not due to depression or medication use, "We can just call it very early Alzheimer's disease. There's no need to have this distinction," Morris said.

    The report is published online today (Feb. 6) in the Archives of Neurology.

    Alzheimer's continuum

    Previously, mild cognitive impairment was defined as a decline in cognitive function — which could include memory and language problems — that do not interfere with everyday activities.

    But the new criteria, proposed by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association, state that people with MCI have "independence in functional activities."

    This could mean that, as long as a person can do everyday activities by themselves, they would be classified as having MCI, even if they had mild problems with activities such as shopping, paying bills and cooking, Morris said. (In fact, having mild problems with such activities is a criterion for dementia, Morris said.)

    To assess what the impact of the new criteria would be on patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, Morris analyzed information from 17,535 people who had been classified as having normal cognition, MCI or Alzheimer's disease. Participants were classified based on how well they could function performing a variety of activities, including preparing meals and taking mediation.

    The results showed 99.8 percent of patients currently diagnosed with very mild Alzheimer's disease, and 92.7 percent of those diagnosed with mild Alzheimer's disease, would be reclassified as having MCI based on the revised criteria.

    Considering about 2.5 million people have very mild Alzheimer's disease, the findings suggest that, very roughly, about 2.2 million people could be reclassified as having MCI (although this calculation is speculative), Morris said.

    Need for biomarkers

    William Thies, chief medical and scientific officer at the Alzheimer's Association, said the proposed criteria for MCI are less than a year old, and experts will likely continue to discuss and tweak them in the years to come.

    "We are really now working on trying to identify exactly where people will fit in the continuum of Alzheimer's disease," Thies said.

    Thies agreed the disease is a continuous process, and said you could likely not tell the difference between someone with the most severe case of MCI and someone with the mildest case of Alzheimer's disease.

    But Thies said he does not think the new criteria will create much confusion. They are intended to be used by experts in the field, some of whom have already been thinking of MCI in the manner described by the new criteria. And others who are very conservative when it comes to diagnosing people with Alzheimer's disease likely won't change their ways, he said.

    Thies also said the field should move toward identifying which patients with MCI are actually in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. This could be done once there are well defined biomarkers for the condition, Thies said.

    While the field is moving toward this goal, it will likely be a while before biomarkers are routinely used by doctors to diagnose patients, he said.

    Pass it on: Identification of biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease will make it easier to diagnosis the condition in its early stages.

    This story was provided by MyHealthNewsDaily, a sister site to LiveScience. Follow MyHealthNewsDaily staff writer Rachael Rettner on Twitter @RachaelRettner. Find us on Facebook.

    What do you feel about this article?

     

    17 comments

    • DGaf  •  3 months ago
      It's simple. Insurance companies want this reclassified so they don't have to provide coverage. How hard was that to figure out.
      • GB 3 months ago
        WRONG! It's Obama care starting to ration medical care.
    • feralhiker  •  3 months ago
      Pharma won't be happy when the insurance companies won't cover their vomit patch for the mildly demented.
    • Sunset  •  Batesville, United States  •  3 months ago
      I can't tell the difference in the mental state of teenagers and older folks. All seem to operate on the same level.At least on Yahoo comments.
    • Eye of Horus  •  3 months ago
      The drug companies don't care because they will still be having psychiatrists pumping drugs into the elderly.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      If this keeps up, you're going to see this: "Insurance Industry Downgrades Limb Amputation as Elective Surgery. Patients No Longer Covered."
    • Jenn  •  3 months ago
      This is very similar to the DSM changes in progress for the autism spectrum disorders. Changing the official criteria doesn't change the physical or mental state of the person. It just means official numbers in diagnoses appear to decline, and that insurance companies don't have to cover as much. It's stupid.
    • Shelly  •  3 months ago
      they might as well just cut to the chase and have the guts to just admit that once the cost of your medical needs equals/exceeds what you've paid in premiums, well then you are out of luck and not worth the money to "fix".

      That is what happens when your health care is tied to a private business that is legally required to put their shareholders interest first. You, the customer are not important. Sadly, though, the gov't would be much better.
    • Jenna  •  3 months ago
      Yep-the medical insurance industry is at it again. To shrink reimbursements for treatments, just shrink the disease. They are also doing this with autism. Sickening.
    • joe joe  •  Cleveland, United States  •  3 months ago
      Wow today's medicine is eliminating many diseases/conditions by reclassifying them.It just goes to show the all time low that we have reached here, and how pathetic the medical community has become, their motto should be "We don't cure anything, we just eliminate you, one way or another".
    • PowerfulWizard  •  3 months ago
      What did I just read above?
      • egami s'doG 3 months ago
        the fine print of your granddad's new insurance policy.
    • NONYA  •  Dalton, United States  •  3 months ago
      Its a classic example of doctors re-defineing their work, when it starts to dip to heavy into their millions invested everywhere.

      Its an instance of TOO MANY people qualifying for money thats going to wind up comming out of THEM.
    • Incredulous  •  3 months ago
      Read the #$%$ article people!!! Or are you all cognitively impaired? This has nothing to do with Obamacare.
    • tuco  •  3 months ago
      Sounds like Obamacare defining away problems so they can be ignored. The whole point of government run "healthcare" is to take it away and only allow the elites in Washington the healthcare they want and need - not you the pee-on.
      • bob 3 months ago
        Please note that there is no reference to any health care program in this story. It is a professional journal making this suggestion...a bad one, but only a suggestion. Don't be so knee jerk negative, eh?
      • Paul 3 months ago
        Thanks, Bob -- I was going to ask where this notion of a government plot came from.
    • BuzzSaw  •  3 months ago
      I'LL BE WILL TO BET ... this after all this mumbo jumbo double talk, this MCI stage a suspiciously high number of people will be assigned to, will mean LESS CARE FOR THEM UNDER MaoBama Care!!

      YOU WATCH!!
      • Paul 3 months ago
        Sorry, I don't follow your argument. The report is very vague on who is responsible for the revised diagnostic definition, but I can't see any suggestion that the government is involved.
      • Jenna 3 months ago
        This is the insurance industry at work, not Obama!
    • GB  •  3 months ago
      Within the last year and a half since Obamacare was passed, we have seen:
      1) A proposed reduction in the frequency of mamograms.
      2) A recommendation that men not receive prostate exams.
      3) A narrowing of the criteria for the diagnosis of autism.
      4) Now, a narrowing in the diagnosis of alzheimers disease.

      Healthcare rationing is well on it's way to the American public thanks to Obamacare.
      • Tom 3 months ago
        I don't see how you can come to that conclusion based on the article as I just read it. I guess this is what they mean when they say "partisan fear mongering". Unfortunately, your eighth grade education is betraying you.
      • bob 3 months ago
        Nothing to do with Health Care Reform. Professional Journal. Only. Lighten. Up.
      • Jenna 3 months ago
        Nothing to do with Obama. Everything to do with the medical insurance industry's endless thirst for illegitimate profits.
    • dictraysee  •  Monroe, United States  •  3 months ago
      wanna bet that this is a part of obama care in conjuction with insurance companys. all together now DEATH PANELS! we were warned but our greed overruled common sense.
    • pvotrainer  •  3 months ago
      there's money in this for someone
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Search