Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Canada Politics

    Is the Harper government a legitimate government?

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks during Question Period. REUTERS/Chris WattieIn response to Justin Trudeau's musings, last week,  about Stephen Harper's Canada and Quebec separation, CBC's At Issue panelist Andrew Coyne had this to say:

    "There's all too much of a temptation, for Liberals in particular, to view the Harper government as fundamentally illegitimate. Not just somebody they disagree with but an abhorrent that has somehow got itself in power."

    Coyne is right on this point.

    The very vocal 'illegitimate government theorists' consistently reference the fact that Stephen Harper's government only received 39 per cent of the popular vote in the last federal election and, therefore, doesn't have a true mandate.

    But the anti-Conservatives conveniently forget that Jean Chretien's three governments didn't fair much better at the polls.

    His party's popular vote percentages in back-to-back-to-back majorities were 41.2 per cent, 39.5 per cent and 40.8 per cent respectively.

    Brian Mulroney introduced the G.S.T. and signed on to NAFTA with a mandate from only 43 per cent of Canadians during his second term.

    And Pierre Trudeau didn't let the fact his party only earned 44 per cent of the popular vote in the 1980 election stop him from passing the Constitution Act of 1982 and, thereby, entrenching the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

    So, why shouldn't the Harper government be able to move forward on its agenda?

    The common refrain from the opposition parties is that 60 per cent of Canadians don't agree with the government.

    But using that logic, 69 per cent 'don't agree' with the New Democrats, 81 per cent 'don't agree' with the Liberals, and 96 per cent 'don't agree' with Elizabeth May and the Greens.

    Is the Harper government a legitimate government?

    It's no less legitimate than any other majority government in the history of Canada.

    What do you feel about this article?

     
    • H Cat  •  3 months ago
      Get this through your heads folks!!! Polititians lie to get into power and they lie when they are in power. Not just Conservatives, not just Liberals, not just the NDP's, not just the partys YOU don't like. ALL of them. Some how we do survive. And when they are voted out they gracefully step aside much unlike the despots of the countries you compare them to.
      • Zaphod398 3 months ago
        Thing is, the Cons seem to be actually doing what they promised they would during the election. Not like when Chretien promised to scrap the GST.
      • Zaphod398 3 months ago
        However, I like your comment.
      • H Cat 3 months ago
        Thankyou but I am sure someone will rip a strip off my #$%$ for telling the truth
    • JohnSomethingOrOther  •  3 months ago
      The Better question would be - Is Yahoo a legitimate News Outlet
      • Dancing As Fast As I Can 3 months ago
        ...and we think the answer is NO if we are to consider legitimate news reporting agencies. On the other hand, if we consider Yahoo to be a sensationalist news reporting agency, then we think the answer would be YES...
      • anothercanadian 3 months ago
        Right on, John!
      • JohnSomethingOrOther 3 months ago
        I get more enjoyment in my day from browsing the yahoo fourms.
        With this much entertainment available, I called Shaw cable and cancelled my TV
    • Elaine  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      We have a "Winner take all". The person receiving the most votes in a riding is the elected MP even if a minority of voters showed up to vote. Harper's government is legitimate because it was elected by the voters who actually voted. Too bad if the majority of voters couldn't be bothered to vote, Maybe at the next election they'll show up to vote. There are enough days and times for advanced polls where one can vote. Many riding candidates will arrange assistance to those voters who have difficulty in getting to the polls because of physical problems. I am not a Harper supporter but I do go and vote.
      • master 3 months ago
        well said Bravo
      • Elaine 3 months ago
        Even if Harper had a minority the GG could still ask him to form a government especially if none of the other parties could form a majority or could not form a coalition government or any reasonable form of government. Many people don't realize that the Cabinet is the government.
      • Hot 501s 3 months ago
        "Winner take all," of "first past the post," only reflects the popular vote when there are just two parties, as was the case in Canada in the 19th century. With three or more, it doesn't work properly, because it tends to hand a majority of seats to a party that hasn't won anything like a majority of the votes. Sometimes the party that won the most votes doesn't even win the most seats! We need a system that ranks our preferences for all of the candidates on the ballot, so that the winner really is the most popular choice in the riding.
    • Keith  •  Calgary, Alberta  •  3 months ago
      why wasnt andy radia asking this of the other parties when they were in power
      • The Real Steve 3 months ago
        In all fairness, he asked and answered the question. Conservatives take the loss better and don't cry and whine like the leftards do.
      • hillman 3 months ago
        Thats not what Radia does, he has no objectivity always anti conservative. He is a joke, must have gone to Ryerson for journalism.
    • Gary W  •  Kingston, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      This will be an issue given the current rules, and is there anybody out there who REALLY wants 10 years of debate and constitutional hair pulling to rewrite the rules of our parliament?
      • Swordsman 3 months ago
        I guess the question is, which is worse? Having a "majority" government that does not represent a majority of the people? Or going through the angst and argument and unpleasantness that will inevitably be the cost of changing the system? As John Kenneth Galbraith said: "Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists in choosing between the unpalatable and the disastrous."
      • master 3 months ago
        if they do open it up they can get rid of the Bilingual act then.
    • Bog  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Is this article arguing that maybe we should switch to American style Congress? maybe not but it is pointing out that the way our system is set up it only takes 39% of the popular vote to own a majority in Canada. This is nothing new. This has been going on for a while. As the system works now whichever party wins the most seats wins the election regardless of popular vote. At this point parliament members are expected to vote along with party lines. Those who vote with their constituts against the wish of the party leader are subject to discipline. Therefore we are not always voting for the best person to represent us as we are often voting for the political party instead. Therefore this is the reason why I do support the idea of free votes in the house.
    • Jo Piper  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  2 months ago
      On the same basis are the Liberals a legitimate party when so few were elected? Is Elizabeth May a legitimate leader of the Green Party when she is the only elected representative? Are the NDP a legitimate "Official Opposition" ?
    • WiseOne  •  3 months ago
      Only a moron would actually want to write an article on this. Hey Andy, cant find anthing better to write about???
    • hughtrafalgar  •  3 months ago
      "an abhorrent that has somehow got itself in power."
      Seems to be an Altruism for ALL political parties.
    • fletcherdaryl  •  3 months ago
      Democracy is the worst form of government until you compare it to all others.
    • Andre B  •  Greater Sudbury, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Let me get this right, going by these stats we should not have a government in Canada at this time because none are worthy of our popular vote. A friend says who can trust liars and thieves.
    • spudsoldier  •  Summerside, Prince Edward Island  •  3 months ago
      There is a lot of difference in being legitimate and being competent or honest.
    • Kyle  •  2 months ago
      May I suggest that people read to the very last sentence of this article before commenting?
    • Falstaff  •  Victoria, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      I'll throw the Liberals a bone and tell them how Harper got into power...
      "... Because the Liberal's leadership sucks!"
    • Robert  •  Gatineau, Quebec  •  3 months ago
      When you have so called Political Leaders ignore the true meaning of a United Canada,then you know that we will never get nobody from any parties to represent us fully,just go on Walmart Canada Financial and look at what a Canadian needs to have a Master Card, you need to be a resident of Canada,excluding Quebec,what an insult,totally pathetic,not one politicain ever raised out this issue but yet they all claim to the world that Canada is very United from coast to coast,even the medias stayed out of this one,now you know why our medias are so censored.
    • patrico24  •  3 months ago
      Where were all these "illegitmate government" pundits when the Libs were in power for 14 years running? Our voting system wasn't such a big deal then, was it? So now they can't win by the rules we've had for 145 years, so their idea is change the rules. Justice Gomery described it as a Liberal culture of entitlement. And that is exactly what it is. Of couse they view the Conservatives as abhorant... because the Conservatives have the power that the Libs view as their personal entitlement. Wow, 34 seats in the last election... a lot of people in Canada obviously disagree!
    • jason  •  3 months ago
      Stupid article to even suggest this - it's the way that the Canadian parliament system is setup.
    • Ian  •  New Westminster, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      There has never been a legitimate federal government in Canada. They all are just puppets for the backroom wheeling dealing gangsters.
    • Law abiding  •  Calgary, Alberta  •  3 months ago
      people that whine are probably the same lazy slackers who couldn't get their butts off the couch.
    • K M  •  King, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      According to the rules we have for Parliamentary majority, his government is totally legitimate! Those who attempt to use other rules and standards are the ones who are legitimate. You may try to change the rules, of course - but according to the rules of parliamentary democracy it is even silly to put up such a headline and article...

    Blog Authors / Profiles