Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Canada Politics

    New poll suggests majority of Canadians support the death penalty

    The death penalty debate in Canada resurfaced last week, when Senator Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu suggested that murderers be given a rope in their cells "to make a decision about his or her life."

    It turns out, the majority of Canadians have the same sentiments as Boisvenu.

    According to a new Angus Reid/Toronto Star poll released Wednesday, Canadians are warming to the idea of a return to capital punishment.

    The survey found that 63 per cent of the 1,002 Canadians surveyed across the country believe the death penalty is sometimes appropriate.

    In particular, sixty-one per cent said capital punishment, which was abolished in Canada in 1976, is warranted for murder.

    But Jaideep Mukerji of Angus Reid says the poll reveals that the death penalty is "not a black and white" issue.

    "We ask[ed] the question in two ways — do you support or oppose the death penalty — and in that context people really do support it," he told the Toronto Star.

    "But when the option of life imprisonment is introduced as an option for those convicted of murder, "50 per cent actually say they would prefer life in prison.""

    On his website, Liberal insider and attorney Warren Kinsella admits that he too, at one time, was a proponent of the death penalty but three years in law school changed his mind:

    "In my first year of law school in Calgary, in Criminal Law, our wonderful prof, Chris Levy, asked us who favoured the death penalty.  Most of the hands in the classroom went up.  Being a Democrat of long-standing, I — like Bill Clinton, like Barack Obama — put my hand up for that one, too.

    Here's what Prof. Levy said next:  "I will ask you again in your final year."

    And he did.  In 1987, after three years of trying to learn the law — and, in my case, I had spent a lot of time on the study of criminal law — Prof. Levy asked again for a show of hands.  "Who favours the death penalty, now?"

    And not a single hand went up.

    What you learn in law school, more than anything else, is how completely flawed our system is.  You learn that it is in need of continual improvement, and that it fundamentally flawed, much like the human beings who created it.

    Reason over passion, Trudeau said."

    What do you feel about this article?

     
    • Dale J  •  Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan  •  3 months ago
      In such cases as Pickton or Olson why not?Why should we pay to keep mass murders alive in prisons,because they have a right to live?Because they can be rehabilitated?What about the rights of the many people they brutally murdered?What about the families who have lost their loved ones to these "upstanding citizens" and re live the pain and haunts day after day for the rest of their lives?Too many bleeding hearts in our society,bring back the death penalty and allow me to do the scuz wads in...
      • g d 3 months ago
        So how many innocent people are you willing to execute to satisfy your blood rage against the ones who are guilty? The system is deeply flawed up to and including police who manipulate evidence.See Stephen Truscott case for an example.
      • Dale J 3 months ago
        GD your just a bleeding heart liberal,I guess you think Pickton and Olson were innocent...
      • Europanfish 2 months ago
        GD's right. Back when Truscott was charged crown prosecutors didn't have to present all pieces of evidence. This led to biased trials and in Truscott's case, almost resulted in a innocent person being executed. Fortunately PM Diefenbaker (a Progressive Conservative btw) had enough sense to commute his sentence and eventually oppose the death penalty overall.

        In regards to Pickton and Olson (who died in prison in Sept.) and other serial killers they should definitely be locked up for life. That's why we have dangerous offender status.
    • Hans G  •  3 months ago
      I agree. The death penalty will do nothing to deter murder. The Shafias etc. would have murdered regardless. But in extreme cases such as Bernardo, Olsen, Pickton, Williams... they need to be removed from the planet.
      • Mr T. 3 months ago
        I disagree. If the Shafias are guilty as charged and at this point they appear to be, then they are no better than Bernardo, Olsen etc. In fact, they're worse, they planned and plotted the murder of their own family members. Oh... excuse me, Bernardo did that too - Carla's sister.
      • pristine 3 months ago
        if i remmeber she was homolka's sister
      • I Used to Be Shy 3 months ago
        And in these cases we need the death penalty. No one says that it should be used for every situation, it's for those extreme ones that do happen out there.
    • ..  •  3 months ago
      Especially child molesters!
      • Sue 3 months ago
        And drug dealers that are selling drugs to kids.
      • Paulanad 3 months ago
        While this may be ideal, these are not punishable by death.
      • Guess 3 months ago
        Child molesters only receive two years..you know timed served then good behavour also counts. Death penalty perfect. That child suffers for years for the damage received from an abuser and so does the family of that child.
    • Painx10  •  3 months ago
      Lois and Susan:If one of your children was convicted of murder will you attend the public hanging? Spare me the rhetoric that "my children" would never do such a thing.
      No one holds their new born in their hands and says "awww there's my little serial killer."
      The vast majority of murders are murders of passion.
      You may soon hear of the trial of a young man where I live who killed his mother.
      He was a friend of my son and i got to know him pretty well myself,however he developed a mental illness which resulted in this tragedy. A nice family and trust me they did not see this coming. His Father is heartbroken but still loves his son very much and will support him every step of the way.
      I believe that the death penalty in some cases is appropriate but not everything is black and white. There is a lot gray area to look at as well.
    • Ivanthehorrible  •  3 months ago
      if we had a death penalty I dont think it would get used much...crown prostitutes/lawyers and judges make far more money recycling offenders in and out of the system...
    • Cat  •  Prince George, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      Canada doesn't have tough penalties now, if we did bring back the death penalty it would never be used anyway. Cops have been killed and only 2 years less a day was given. I mean who are we kidding?
      • Painx10 3 months ago
        Can you name that example? I'm not disagreeing with you,I just never remember a cop killing where there was such a short sentence.
      • Cat 3 months ago
        Cst Jimmy Ng was killed in Richmond, BC in 2002 by a street racer. That was the penalty, 2 years less a day
    • Bog  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      I don't believe in sentancing someone to die but I do believe in giving a convicted murderer or child molester the option of dying. That is a lot more than they offered their victims.
      • Paul 3 months ago
        killers dont deserve options!!!!!!
      • trevor 3 months ago
        Ok paul. Yes they do.
      • Susan 3 months ago
        trevor maybe you wouldnt feel that way if someone killed your child/mother/wife etc - people who murder deserve no options
    • nyloc5  •  Nanaimo, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      come on when your caught with body parts in your freezer your guilty. eye for an eye.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      Dear Warren Kinsella, the reason none of the lawyers put up their hands was because they would in essence negate their existence if their client ran out of appeal options or ways to drag out some litigation in our flawed court system. If at first you don't get off... keep appealing until you do! If you lose a client, who will pay the bills?
    • Fry  •  3 months ago
      Statistically proven, Capital Punishment actually costs tax payers more than Life in Prison without the possibility of parole.
      More importantly, there have been dozens of people convicted of First Degree Murder, who have had their sentences reversed when it was proven that they didn't even do it.
      All those people would have died had we still had Capital Punishment, and they were all innocent.
      Capital Punishment is severely flawed and a part of history best left in the past.
    • TAXPAYER  •  Ottawa, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Everybody deserves to live without the threat of being killed by a convicted murderer out on parole ..
    • Lites  •  3 months ago
      how about giving the senators the rope?
    • Barb  •  3 months ago
      ask guy paul morin or david milgaard what they think.
    • Greg  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      They didn't survey me.
    • btrow1946  •  3 months ago
      Tell me something I didn't expect. With DNA now, you can be certain the guilty will get what they deserve. It'll save the taxpayer over $100,000 per year it costs to keep these animals in the slammer. Cost of a bullet? You do the math! If I heard Bernardo was going to get the death penalty, I'd be one of thousands willing to sign up for the firing squad.
    • beachy head...  •  Mississauga, Ontario  •  2 months ago
      since we do nott have a death penalty,life in prison should be life the full 25 years
      and not in one of canada"s resort type prisons.build one in the arctic and no fancy
      meals,back to bread and water, we are much to easy on murderes especially
      religous zelots and their rights which we even seem to abide by in canada!!!!!!!!
    • pushimiga  •  3 months ago
      Ask David Milgaard and Steven Truscott what they think about the death penalty.
    • Erik  •  3 months ago
      I wish someone would hang the useless Senate. Bunch of do nothing twits with golden pensions. What a joke.
    • whit79  •  Tampa, United States  •  3 months ago
      yes we do and that includes goverment officials, lawyers and cops that break the law
    • Emma  •  London, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      The question is this: does killing them, make us any better than they are? Personally I don't think it does. Killing is killing. It doesn't matter who does it, how it's done, or why it's done. So either we stoop to their level, of killing because they are inconvenient (like many murderers do), or we find another way forward.

    Blog Authors / Profiles