Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Daily Buzz

    Columbia University offering course in Occupy movement

    Students can take courses in everything from ancient art to The Simpsons at different universities, but now Columbia University students will be able to learn more about one of the biggest news stories of 2011.

    Dr. Hannah Appel will be teaching a course all about the Occupy protest and it will include a lot of fieldwork.

    "The course offers training in ethnographic research methods alongside a critical exploration of the conjunctural issues in the Occupy movement: Wall Street, finance capital, and inequality; political strategies, property and public space, and the question of anarchy; and genealogies of the contemporary moment in global social movements," reads the course syllabus. "This class is about rigorous and creative intellectual inquiry, not movement-building or political conversation."

    Appel claims to have spent nights at Zuccotti Park in New York City and defends the movement on her blog.

    "It is important to push back against the rhetoric of 'disorganization' or 'a movement without a message' coming from left, right and centre."

    Of course, the ironic part to the class is hard to miss. Columbia is an Ivy League private school that routinely ranks as one of the best in the U.S. Tuition for a Bachelor of Arts or Science is more than $23,000 a year, making it more than four times the price of most bachelor degrees at public schools in Canada. And according to Inside Higher Ed, full-time Columbia professors earn on average $191,400.

    Those numbers are a lot closer to the top per cent rather than the 99 per cent. The Blaze argues if professors want to have a discussion on "income inequality," they should talk about these figures in relation to average salaries for Marines or police officers.

    As many as 30 students will take part in the anthropology class that will involve classroom seminars and as part of the fieldwork students must get involved in ongoing Occupy projects.

    While the protests have turned violent in the past, she writes on the syllabus students will be safe.

    "I can say with absolute certainty that there is no foreseeable risk in teaching this as a field-based class," reads the syllabus. "On the contrary, the risks of disengaged scholarship seem more profound."

    Given her background, Appel still feels she will be objective.

    "Inevitably, my experience will colour the way I teach, but I feel equipped to teach objectively," Appel told The New York Post. "It's best to be critical of the things we hold most sacred."

    (Reuters photo)

    What do you feel about this article?

     

    11 comments

    • mark_3_1_6  •  4 months ago
      Taking useless courses like these are why recent graduates cannot find meaningful work. Universities and colleges need to focus on teaching job skills and stop analyzing nonsense and challenging students to write essays about things they happen to find interesting. Do I find accounting interesting? Not paticularly, there are certainly many other subjects I'd prefer to have studied, but I decided to undertake a degree in accounting because it will help me get a job. I graduated 2 years ago, the job market was even worse then, it took some time, but I did find a job and I am now earning money and paying off my loans. Don't waste your tuition on garbage courses that aren't going to get you anywhere. School is an investment unless you're rich enough to afford it not paying off in the end. Remeber that.
      • DOUGLAS 4 months ago
        Great post! Well said. You are a fine example for others to follow.
    • DOUGLAS  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  4 months ago
      A class to teach promising young students to be bums? Or teach them not to work? Not to have goals? Not to understand that you get out of life what you put into it?
      What nonsense!
      • Maneo 4 months ago
        Clearly you didn't read the article.

        The article explicitly remarks that the class is not about rallying a political movement.

        The purpose of the course is to study the causes and implications of the OWS movement.

        Your comment is like the equivalent of criticizing a history class focused around the US Revolution, claiming that its teaching people to overthrow the government instead of solving their own problems which the government didn't create.

        Its like first of all, that's not even an appropriate summary of OWS or the Revolution. And secondly, its not about learning to do the same thing, its about studying what happened.
    • RON M  •  Maynard, United States  •  4 months ago
      An occupy supporter at an Ivy League school ... now that's funny!
      • Maneo 4 months ago
        What's wrong with the educated supporting a movement for the rights of 99% of the population?

        Your comment is like a person in the 60s being like "a white person supporting civil rights... now that's funny!"
    • Eric C  •  4 months ago
      Its better if the course is open to the 99% - as I see it the course is only open to those who can afford $40,000, its still for the 1%.
      • Maneo 4 months ago
        Columbia's financial aid meet 100% of need, meaning that no matter how poor you are you can afford to attend Columbia.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Springfield, United States  •  4 months ago
      Is the "professor" giving up her tenured salary? Must be nice to be paid for such nonsense.
    • mike  •  Chatham-Kent, Ontario  •  4 months ago
      This was a very smart idea about the power of media,TV.
      Can be courses about media . video, Internet.

      Reed the TIME MAGAZINE.
    • anna  •  4 months ago
      Comments would be so much more insightful if people actually READ the articles they're commenting on.
    • Clearcom  •  Wakefield, New Brunswick  •  4 months ago
      How to be a dead beat in one easy lesson.One question is the course free ?
    • Flipider  •  4 months ago
      What the Occupy Movement mean to me. Henry Stone of Tedeschi Food shops 14 Howard Street, Rockland (781) 610-2230 fired me after 27 years of perfect work and reasoning for which was me showing up on time to do the work in the 228 Columbia Rd. Hanover, MA, 02339 store on time. He couldn't at that time Henry Stone fire me for all the corporate stores I changed the the time I started doing the work by which it would be safer for me to move the work out of February to March. My mistrust in Home Office in Rockland, MA. I started testing them to see what they would grab on. I tricked them. I expanded that I got no complaints when a Tedeschi Family was doing quality control at 1638 Falmouth Rd. Centerville, MA, 02632. Henry Stone then lied that I was argumentative with a Tedeschi Family member. I got into a bike accident and decided to call the 105 Trowbridge Rd. Borne, MA, 02532 there was no way I could physically do the work and Henry Stone fire me for all the corporate stores saying I was demanding to do the work. I though it was funny. Not like I could fake an injury. I snapped the crankshaft on my bike. The money I earned went into the fixing of my Mom's house to pay for her health problems and who starved to death from her Alzheimer because of lacking in money to pay for a stomach feeding tube.
      • Clearcom 4 months ago
        What was that. Ok im dizzy now.
    • Maneo  •  Binghamton, United States  •  4 months ago
      "Those numbers are a lot closer to the top per cent rather than the 99 per cent."

      Looks like somebody failed statistics.

      99 + 1 = 100, which means that those two labels can be used to categorize EVERYBODY. It can't be closer to one or close to the other, because it either is one or is the other.

      Columbia professors actually would be in the 99%. If we broke it down to 98% and 2%, then they might be in the 2%.

      What people don't realize is that the 1% that we are fighting against is the people who make $20 million a year. We seem to mistakenly target those who receive their paycheck's from the 1%, who are actually just as much victims as the rest of you.

      Why alienate somebody making twice as much as you, when your enemy is someone who is making ONE HUNDRED times more than a Columbia professor and TWO HUNDRED times more than you?
    • Blastfemur  •  4 months ago
      Another "basket weaving 101" course! And she gets paid to teach this crap?

    Blog Authors / Profiles