Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Canada Pension Plan vs. Old Age Security

    The federal government has sought to assure Canadians that their pensions are secure after Prime Minister Stephen Harper suggested last week that there could be changes coming to Old Age Security benefits.

    On Monday, Harper revisited the issue and said the government would not cut the OAS, but would examine challenges facing the country's retirement income system.

    "We will ensure our vital programs are sustainable in the long-term and for future generations," Harper said.

    "The reality is that we aren’t cutting programs for seniors."

    Apart from private money squirreled away in an RRSP or other savings vehicles, the OAS and complementary Canada Pension Plan are key components in the retirement planning of many Canadians. But many people confuse the two programs, how much they pay, and who's eligible for them.

    Here is a look at OAS and the CPP and how they differ.

    What is OAS?

    The Old Age Security pension is a monthly payment available to Canadians aged 65 and older who apply and meet certain requirements. Unlike CPP, it is not dependent on a person's employment history and a person does not need to be retired from a job to qualify.

    The government adjusts the OAS payment every three months to account for increases in the cost of living according to the Consumer Price Index. The average monthly amount was $508.35 in the last quarter of 2011. The maximum payout for the first quarter of 2012 is $540.12.

    There are also supplementary programs, including the Guaranteed Income Supplement, which provide additional income to low-income seniors.

    The government claws back OAS payments from high-income Canadians. In 2011, for example, if you were retired but had an income of more than $67,668 (from things like pensions and personal investments), the government would reclaim part of your OAS payment - 15 cents for every dollar of income that you had above the $67,668 threshold. That means that if you were retired with an annual income of around $110,000 or more in 2011, your OAS payout would be reduced to zero.

    Who is eligible?

    OAS is available to Canadian citizens and legal residents living in the country who have spent at least 10 years in Canada after they turned 18.

    It is also open to people outside of the country who were Canadian citizens or legal residents on the day they left the country, as long as they spent at least 20 years of their adult life in Canada.

    When should you apply?

    A person should apply for OAS six months before they turn 65. If you have not lived in Canada continuously or were not born in Canada, the government requires a statement containing all the dates when you entered and left the country. It may also ask for supporting documentation.

    If a person applies after age 65, they can receive up to 11 months in retroactive payments along with a payout for the month in which a person applies to receive OAS. So if a person applied after their 66th birthday, they would receive 12 months of OAS payments.

    How is the rate calculated?

    In order to qualify for a full pension, a person must have lived in Canada for at least 40 years after turning 18. People also qualify if they reached the age of 25 on or before July 1, 1977, and either lived in Canada, had some residency in the country after age 18, or held a valid Canadian immigration visa and spent the 10 years immediately before appying in Canada.

    For those who do not qualify for a full pension, a partial amount is paid out based on the number of years spent living in Canada. For instance, if a person has spent 36 years of their adult life in the country, they will earn 36/40th of the full OAS amount.

    Based on the eligibilty requirements, the minimum payout is one-quarter of the total, to account for a total of 10 years spent in Canada.

    Once a partial pension has been approved, the percentage of the total OAS pension received will never increase even if a person spends more years in Canada.

    What is CPP?

    The Canada Pension Plan is a form of retirement income that is open to all Canadians who have worked and paid into the system through deductions from their paycheques. The amount a person receives under the system depends on how much and for how long a person contributed, along with the age at which a person started receiving CPP payments.

    There are three types of CPP benefits: disability benefits, retirement pension and survivor benefits. For the purposes of clarity, this article focuses on retirement pension form of CPP.

    The average monthly CPP benefit in 2011 was $512.64. The maximum payment in 2012 is $987.67. The government adjusts the CPP rate every January to account for changes in cost of living as measured by the Consumer Price Index.

    According to Service Canada, "If you have lived and worked in Canada most years between age 18 and 65 and earned about the average Canadian wage ($39,100 in 2002), at age 65 you would receive a CPP retirement pension of about $788 a month."

    Who is eligible?

    Anyone who has made at least one payment into CPP is eligible for benefits once they reach the age of 65, but the size of the benefits depends on how much and for how long a person contributed into the plan and at what age they start receiving benefits.

    A person can begin receiving CPP anytime after age 60 if they stop working or reduce their income, although they incur a financial penalty by doing so. In 2012, a person receiving CPP early will be subject to a 0.52 per cent reduction for each month before the age of 65 that they received payments. That number is slated to rise to 0.6 per cent each month in 2016.

    On the other hand, if a person chooses to delay CPP payments they receive a similar increase for each month they wait between the age of 65 and 70. In 2012, that increase works out to 0.64 per cent per month and will rise to 0.7 per cent next year.

    When should you apply?

    This is really up to the individual and whether they want to receive a smaller or larger CPP benefit. However, the government recommends applying six months before a person wants their pension to begin.

    Canadians can apply online or print out an application and deliver it to a Service Canada location.

    Similar to OAS, a person can receive retroactive payments covering up to 12 months if they delay applying for CPP until after their 71st birthday.

    How much do I contribute to CPP?

    An employed person's annual contribution to the CPP is the equivalent of 9.9 per cent of their total pensionable income, half of which is paid by the employee and half by the employer. Annual pensionable earnings are capped at a maximum that is adjusted each January (for 2012, it is $50,100), and there is a basic exemption amount of $3,500. For 2012, that brings the maximum employer and employee contribution to $2,306.70 each.

    Self-employed people must contribute 9.9 per cent of their net business income, with the same $50,100 cap and $3,500 basic exemption, bring their maximum CPP contribution for 2012 to $4,613.40.

    Anyone earning less than $3,500 is automatically exempt from CPP contributions.

    At age 70, a person stops contributing to CPP even if they continue working.

    What do you feel about this article?

     

    48 comments

    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      Anyone bashing OAS as freeloading, remember that for women now retirement age were not always 'allowed' to work outside or stayed at home with kids, mix that with nasty divorces where they got nothing, were out of the work force for years then the only jobs they could get were low paying so the spouse would not have to pay more income tax, etc, etc etc... Need I say more? Until you have walked a mile in someone else's shoes and know of their conditions, do not judge.
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        Thank You. Well put !
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        My sister was never allowed to work in 35 years of marriage. She has worked some part time jobs and receives a small support check from her ex. It is people like this that OAS was meant for.
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        Women who are now at retirement age were not ALLOWED to work? Wow,
        At 65, she would have been born in 1947, at the end of the war so she would be the first of the baby boomer who were blamed and cursed by the younger generation for ruining the economy and livelihood and everything else. She will also reach adulthood around 1965 during the Hippie years where woman's lib were flourishing. Those were the years that many more women, with the supports and encouragement of their parents, went to University and entered the work force alongside with the male colleagues.
        For the last 10 to 15 years, there have been numerous articles in newspapers, magazines, radios, TV, etc. educating and warning people (especially women) over 45 to get prepare for the retirement years. Many women with vision followed the advice and upgraded their skills to improve their earning power and save for the future. While I accept that OAS should be used to help those who are less fortunate, not everyone need them.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      Politicians put 1 dollar in and get 21 dollars contributed by the taxpayer, end up with full pension at 55, only 6 years of service required, long term politicians like the Steven Harper have pensions worth over 6 Million Dollars and growing, its easy when there is a $1 of your own to $21 of the taxpayer.
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        $1+$23.20 ?
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        he is trying to tell you that for every $1 they (politicians) contribute, they are getting another $21 from us taxpayers.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Langley, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      why is it allowed for someone who has lived in Canada for 10 years, but never worked a day of their life in this country, paid tax or contributed to Canada, be allowed to claim $540 dollars this is shameful!
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        I totally agree with you they should claim in the country where they worked !
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        Politicians use this kind of thing to work the "room" when their trolling for votes what do they care with the 21/1 deal they have.
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        I don't understand this either. I have nothing against people moving to Canada but just doesn't seem to make sense that they are able to claim this money after only 10 years. Seems like there is no such thing as common sense in Ottawa.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Prince George, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      Our Governmnt needs to set an example cutting from their wages and pension plan.
      It appears that they are so busy wallowing with the pigs, that they forgot about the little man who pays their wages and benifit packages.
      Mr. Harper its about need, like a roof over our heads, food for our bellies and the utility bills paid .
      We are not asking for much just a little fair play with money!!
      Share the wealth with those who need it, it's not about want!!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Kitchener, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      It's about time there was an article about this. There are simply too many uninformed assumption-making individuals out there.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Kitchener, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      I am against people bringing their old parents here and wait 10 years without working until they can receive the OAS .I consider it abuse against hard working Canadians.Myself I have two old parents overseas but i never had this though in my mind .It is unacceptable..they should claim their pensions in the country were they worked !! Or the children who brought them should be responsible for them until they are alive.
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        It is not just the pensions it is the burden to health care.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Trent Hills, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      After 31 years of marriage..now divorced...I am trying to made my retirement work next year. I am one of the luckier ones who owns my own house..and have small expenses..not everyone is so lucky. I will need CPP and OAS to survive, along with a small pension from work. Suggestion. Try not to live beyond your means and save for a rainy day (TFSA) I do believe we must look out for our future children and grandchildren.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Edmonton, Alberta  •  3 months ago
      I would like to see the gvmt not allow prisoners to collect OES Like that creep Clifford Olso did, if your in jail you lose that privlidge IMO, gvmt is already paying your way !
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        Prisoners are not currently allowed to collect OAS.
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        Hey Have, with your conservative gov't in power, there will be more prisoners so less OAS, more tax to run prisons. Fair deal eh?
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Saskatoon, Saskatchewan  •  3 months ago
      How about the government redoing their pensions..........It is a gravy train at best and no Canadian had any say in its formation...........Politicians are thieves and self serving...........Start at the top with reform !!!!!!!!!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Temiskaming Shores, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      If the government stopped stacking their bank accounts with uncalled raises and forcing us to work until we DIE is insane you bunch of idotic fools.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Baby boomers are entitled to collect what they have worked toward. Instead of Harper worrying about having something for the younger generations, why doesn't he stop to think about how these younger generations are still living in their parents houses even into their 30's, and sucking their parents dry financially, and how they live their lives with a sense of entitlement, and how they can't hold on to jobs because they don't think any employer has the right to tell them what time to come to work, and they don't think they need to get an education because as far as their concerned they KNOW IT ALL. Instead of us contributing more and more to this entitled, self centered, lazy generation of youngsters, why not let the baby boomers retire in peace and not live in poverty when they do. I see dozens of old people all around me everyday who are tryingt o survive on the 500.00 a month oas, and their kids have already sucked every last dime out of them, and they have nothing left now to live on, and then I have to listen to harper threaten to take that 500.00 a month away from them also - this is pathetic. Why doesn't he pick on someone his own size. It's sad when we've got people who served in the war living in poverty in their old age, and seniors who helped build this country who can't afford food and medications, this sickens me.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Montreal, Quebec  •  3 months ago
      we should start sending postcard to the PM so he can leave the pension alone and degrade the mp pension instead
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Kelowna, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      I would like to hear of more complaints being sent to one's MP as this news story was
      prolly developed after a big outcry from Canadian taxpayers...doing just that .
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Newmarket, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Boy, I can hardly wait to retire and start living in poverty. I guess that i should start stockpiling meowmix now while I can still afford it!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Burlington, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Cut Harper's $6+Million Government Pension and the MP's,Senators,etc.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      Wasn't it Bob Rae who recently wanted to give pensions to immigrants after them being here for only 3 years. Now after 4 decades of contributions to both CCP and being income taxed through tthe #$%$ to pay for OAS they want to cut or delay the age Canadians are eligble to collect. Every person should have to work at least 35 years. No immigrants no matter how old should ever receive any type of pension unless they meet the same requirement.I've said it before and I'll keep saying it until people demand a cut to Welfare and Mother's Allowance. No one deserves to be supported their whole life by the taxpayer. Being a single parent doesn't give a person the right as they think it does to be fully supported from 18 until 50 just because they have a child. In most cases they continue to have children to stay on #$%$isstance longer. They're adult enough to have sex and give birth but don't have to be adult enough to be responsible and self suffient. Also women on #$%$isstance tend to smoke and eat more and live a sedate lifestyle adding more expense to the taxpayer in health care cost.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      how about take 10% or 20% enough? or maybe 50% from MP pension putting it directly to OAS or CCP, after all it is money from taxpayer anyway.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Montreal, Quebec  •  3 months ago
      ya big bucks for the politicians for clapping their hands and stomping their feet for 6 years so to collect poor income tax payers dollars while living high on the hog---why not do the same to them ---make them pay until they are 65 and only collect after 67---then we would see the S.O. B's opt out of their cushy positions and cry foul
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      WOW wait,Harper where not talking about are pensions to change,,its yours, and all the other politicians pensions..Whatcha talking about,,,,
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Burlington, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      I will believe Steve when I get my pension in the form of payment it is intended to be before his speech saying it would be adjusted.
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Search

    News for You

    • Donald Driver & Peta Murgatroyd Win Dancing With The Stars
      Donald Driver & Peta Murgatroyd Win Dancing With The Stars

      They called it "the most competitive season" ever on "Dancing with the Stars," but on Tuesday night, just one pair was good enough for Season 14 mirrorball glory.

    • US climber describes deadly congestion on Everest
      US climber describes deadly congestion on Everest

      An American adventurer who helped rescue four climbers from Mount Everest last weekend has told of how a crowded push for the summit and bad weather created deadly conditions for mountaineers.

    • American Idol Finale Recap: Phillip Phillips & Jessica Sanchez Battle It Out
      American Idol Finale Recap: Phillip Phillips & Jessica Sanchez Battle It Out

      "American Idol" returned to the Nokia Theatre L.A. Live on Tuesday as Jessica Sanchez and Phillip Phillips battled it out for the title. The two contenders couldn't have been more different - Jessica Sanchez, the 16-year-old with the big, big voice, and Phillip Phillips, the 21-year-old bashful singer with a soulful edge. Here's how the finale went down:

    • Dancing With The Stars Finals Recap: Who Busted Out A Stunning Country Freestyle?
      Dancing With The Stars Finals Recap: Who Busted Out A Stunning Country Freestyle?

      It was the most thrilling night of competition in Season 14 as the three celebrity finalists on "Dancing with the Stars" hit the dance floor on Monday night, causing a stir in the ballroom with two rounds of headline-making moves.

    • Queen told William to rip up wedding guest list
      Queen told William to rip up wedding guest list

      Queen Elizabeth II told her grandson Prince William to rip up the guest list he was given for his wedding and do it again himself to include his friends, he said in an interview.

    • Pakistani doctor jailed for helping CIA find bin Laden
      Pakistani doctor jailed for helping CIA find bin Laden

      PESHAWAR, Pakistan (Reuters) - Pakistani authorities have sentenced a doctor accused of helping the CIA find Osama bin Laden to 33 years in jail on charges of treason, officials said, a move almost certain to further strain ties between Washington and Islamabad. Shakil Afridi was accused of running a fake vaccination campaign, in which he collected DNA samples, that is believed to have helped the American intelligence agency track down bin Laden in a Pakistani town. The al Qaeda chieftain was killed …

    • Fired for being "too hot," New Jersey woman claims

      (Reuters) - A New Jersey woman said on Monday that she was dismissed from a temporary job at a New York lingerie warehouse because her male employers felt she was too busty and dressed too provocatively for the workplace. Wearing a form-fitting sequined black dress and black leather, sequin-studded boots, Lauren Odes, 29, said her Orthodox Jewish employers at Native Intimates told her that outfit and others like it were "too hot" for the warehouse. "We should not be judged by the size of our breasts …