Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Canada pulls out of NATO surveillance project

    Canada is pulling out of a NATO surveillance project 20 years in the making that will use unmanned aerial vehicles to collect information.

    The Alliance Ground Surveillance project was conceived in 1992. Canada signed a memorandum of understanding with 13 other countries, including the U.S., Germany and Norway, in 2009.

    The program, with its main operating base in Italy, would have cost Canada up to $450 million over 20 years for acquisition and in-service support. But it's now seen as a legacy project that's not affordable because of global economic conditions and Canada faced with having to make decisions over where to spend its defence budget.

    A spokeswoman for the Department of National Defence said the full withdrawal will be effective in spring of 2012.

    "NATO has been informed of these decisions. The details of our withdrawal are still under discussion with NATO," Kim Tulipan said in an emailed response to a queston from CBC News.

    "Canada’s commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Alliance (NATO) is unwavering. Canada is delivering on NATO operations around the world and has been at the forefront of efforts to transform and reform the Alliance to meet modern-day needs."

    A NATO website for the surveillance project said the ability to have "eyes on target" at strategic ranges is a vital requirement and refers to the 2011 mission in Libya as an example of how surveillance is useful. The mission in Libya saw NATO troops provide air cover to protect anti-Moammar Gadhafi forces as they fought to unseat the country's leader.

    The system would allow NATO to perform surveillance over wide areas from "high-altitude, long-endurance, unmanned aerial platforms operating at considerable stand-off distances and in any weather or light condition."

    NATO said the surveillance system will help monitor weapons of mass destruction and military force build-ups, evacuation operations, civil unrest and anti-piracy.

    At a press conference last Friday to mark the end of the NATO defence ministers meeting, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said members had "found the way ahead on a practical funding solution" for the system.

    "This means that a group of allies will acquire five reconnaissance drones. NATO will then maintain and operate them on behalf of all 28 allies. This will give our commanders the ability to see what is happening on the ground at long range and over periods of time – around the clock, and in any weather," he said.

    Canada entered into an agreement on satellite surveillance and communications last month. The agreement with the U.S. and Australia gives Canada access to secure communication, surveillance and UAVs.

    What do you feel about this article?

     

    38 comments

    • xenaphobe  •  Fraser Valley, British Columbia  •  3 months ago
      $450 million STUFF IT UP YOUR NATO ASSSES
    • Tyler Austin  •  Midland, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      We pull out of a NATO project yet we won't oull our diplomates out of Syria?
      • r 3 months ago
        if we pull our dips out of syria then we have no more eyes there, to see for ourselves what is happening, and have to rely on other nations to tell us whats happening, keeping the dips there is very wise if you care anything about getting the truth out of there.. pull em out when they are in immediate danger
      • disgusted 3 months ago
        We need to keep diplomats on teh ground there.
      • '49 Fairlane 3 months ago
        french oriented troublesome kiddies.
        R,whose we?id.
        Dis,to foment more trouble for assad?
    • egami s'doG  •  3 months ago
      whoa, first Canada stands up to the global warming hoax now they're going against NATO's drone program?

      yikes. the NWO cannot be pleased about this.

      Okay, i'm going to try get out in front of the American media on this one: Canada does not have WMDs. We are not hiding Osama Bin Laden. We are not working on a nuclear reactor. And there is no faux rebellion taking place that we need your "help" overthrowing our government.

      Okay?
    • jack123  •  3 months ago
      dont worry, im sure china will take control of it if they havnt already
    • craigsstrat  •  Halifax, Nova Scotia  •  3 months ago
      Tou know in the 70's they could pick up a pin in your drineway by sattalite.Nowdays with the type of satalite and military capabilities they can put any area up on a screen at anytime and moniter the activities.We live in an Orwellian paradise.Just think of all the homicides they could solve using military satelite survalence.Google Earth undoubtedly has a built in Military capability.Disclaimer all subject material is conjectual and based on theory.For entertainment purposes only.
    • abc123  •  3 months ago
      Now the USA & others can spy on us.....with the blessing of our Prime Minister......civil unrest? That's us people.
      • disgusted 3 months ago
        Paranoid yet?
      • '49 Fairlane 3 months ago
        u r
      • mike 3 months ago
        @Disgusted- News flash , the U.S & others have been spying on Canada for many years.
    • Taxed2death  •  3 months ago
      We should pull all funding out of Nato,the UN and the IMF
      • rocksterrakoon 3 months ago
        The UN and the IMF yes, but not NATO.
      • '49 Fairlane 3 months ago
        why not? china will soon lookout for us................
      • Taxed2death 3 months ago
        I was in the 4 mech group, 2 PPCLI, baden in the eighties...I saw first hand what a waste of time and money is all about
    • golfer  •  Edmonton, Alberta  •  3 months ago
      Drones a gps wow I feel safe..............Better shutup I could be confused as a terrorist.....
    • dan  •  3 months ago
      Aw C'mon Harper, thats only one day of G8/G20 photo-ops
    • many owls  •  3 months ago
      canada isnt that paranoid.
      • YukonGold 3 months ago
        maybe not now, but 5 more years of this BS and we better become paranoid.
    • Mrjro2  •  Thunder Bay, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      We've got to pay for those jets and ships somehow...
    • Gordon  •  3 months ago
      After 20 years we're pulling out of a NATO level intelligence gathering program? This is probably better money spent than on the $50 Billion we've allocated for the F-35s and can provide info that could help prevent conflicts by getting the information to act before things get totally out of hand. Also, once we're out won't we be denied access to the information gathered unless the others want to 'do us a favor'? Worse, that since we won't have access to the raw data anymore, how will we know we're getting an 'unfiltered' picture of what our allies know? I think this is a government that prefers big shinny toys to show off, like frigates and fighters and not the real nuts and bolts that enables us to use them effectively.
      • Matthew 3 months ago
        I agree but if anything maybe we should start making our own military equipment, that way we have our own drones, that we made ourselves.
      • mike 3 months ago
        Canada will never build it's own military equipment because of the many billions it costs for research & development.
    • downwithharper  •  3 months ago
      have to pay for the new boats somehow
    • CDC  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Right. How about the single-sourced "toy" planes?
    • zibazef  •  3 months ago
      When I was young and lived in a railroad town in Ontario, we watched train after train of scrap metal being shipped to Japan. " Pearl Harbour happened. " Now we are going to sell uranium and oil to China. China will have uranium for nuclear weapons and the fuel to fly the delivery method of these bombs. Is now the time for us to be pulling out of NATO?
    • spartacusnow  •  Edmonton, Alberta  •  3 months ago
      Don't need it, Canada still uses open cockpit biplanes for surviellance. More cost effective in Harper's eyes.
    • Me  •  Montreal, Quebec  •  3 months ago
      not sure its such a good idea Harper is playing risk with american ..just telling my feeling has a soldier not doing politic here
    • John BL  •  Windsor, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      Canada needs to pull out of NATO period! Its only a U.S. run organization anyhow. Sounds like big brother is keeping their eye on us.
    • IA Ranger  •  3 months ago
      Big brother is watching.......can you say 'NWO'?
    • WakeUpAmerica  •  Toronto, Ontario  •  3 months ago
      "surveillance system will help monitor weapons of mass destruction"

      So NATO "detected" Sadam's "mass destruction" means, prior to INVADING Iraq with NO WAR DECLARATION ! Nice free-gift to Isra-Hitler...
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Search

    News for You

    • Donald Driver & Peta Murgatroyd Win Dancing With The Stars
      Donald Driver & Peta Murgatroyd Win Dancing With The Stars

      They called it "the most competitive season" ever on "Dancing with the Stars," but on Tuesday night, just one pair was good enough for Season 14 mirrorball glory.

    • US climber describes deadly congestion on Everest
      US climber describes deadly congestion on Everest

      An American adventurer who helped rescue four climbers from Mount Everest last weekend has told of how a crowded push for the summit and bad weather created deadly conditions for mountaineers.

    • American Idol Finale Recap: Phillip Phillips & Jessica Sanchez Battle It Out
      American Idol Finale Recap: Phillip Phillips & Jessica Sanchez Battle It Out

      "American Idol" returned to the Nokia Theatre L.A. Live on Tuesday as Jessica Sanchez and Phillip Phillips battled it out for the title. The two contenders couldn't have been more different - Jessica Sanchez, the 16-year-old with the big, big voice, and Phillip Phillips, the 21-year-old bashful singer with a soulful edge. Here's how the finale went down:

    • Dancing With The Stars Finals Recap: Who Busted Out A Stunning Country Freestyle?
      Dancing With The Stars Finals Recap: Who Busted Out A Stunning Country Freestyle?

      It was the most thrilling night of competition in Season 14 as the three celebrity finalists on "Dancing with the Stars" hit the dance floor on Monday night, causing a stir in the ballroom with two rounds of headline-making moves.

    • Queen told William to rip up wedding guest list
      Queen told William to rip up wedding guest list

      Queen Elizabeth II told her grandson Prince William to rip up the guest list he was given for his wedding and do it again himself to include his friends, he said in an interview.

    • Pakistani doctor jailed for helping CIA find bin Laden
      Pakistani doctor jailed for helping CIA find bin Laden

      PESHAWAR, Pakistan (Reuters) - Pakistani authorities have sentenced a doctor accused of helping the CIA find Osama bin Laden to 33 years in jail on charges of treason, officials said, a move almost certain to further strain ties between Washington and Islamabad. Shakil Afridi was accused of running a fake vaccination campaign, in which he collected DNA samples, that is believed to have helped the American intelligence agency track down bin Laden in a Pakistani town. The al Qaeda chieftain was killed …

    • Fired for being "too hot," New Jersey woman claims

      (Reuters) - A New Jersey woman said on Monday that she was dismissed from a temporary job at a New York lingerie warehouse because her male employers felt she was too busty and dressed too provocatively for the workplace. Wearing a form-fitting sequined black dress and black leather, sequin-studded boots, Lauren Odes, 29, said her Orthodox Jewish employers at Native Intimates told her that outfit and others like it were "too hot" for the warehouse. "We should not be judged by the size of our breasts …