Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    College and Marriage May Not Mix for the Disadvantaged

    For people from disadvantaged backgrounds, college can offer the promise of a lucrative career. But new research finds that for this group, college also decreases the odds of getting married.

    In general, education is linked with marriage: About half of Americans are currently married, but that number rises to 64 percent among college graduates. A college education also increases the likelihood of having a marriage that lasts, studies show. But for people who grow up disadvantaged, a college education seems to trap them between social worlds, according to a new study published in the Journal of Marriage and Family.

    "College students are becoming more diverse in their social backgrounds, but they nonetheless remain a socioeconomically select group," study researcher Kelly Musick, a sociologist at Cornell University, said in a statement. "It may be difficult for students from less privileged backgrounds to navigate social relationships on campus, and these difficulties may affect what students ultimately gain from the college experience."

    In other words, college students from low-socioeconomic-status backgrounds may be reluctant to "marry down" to partners with less education, but they also may not "marry up" to partners with more privileged backgrounds.

    Musick and her colleagues used data from a sample of 3,200 Americans from the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, a group that was followed from adolescence into adulthood. They estimated the propensity of men's and women's college attendance based on family income, parental education and other indicators of social background and early academic achievement. They then grouped their subjects into social strata based on these propensity scores and compared marriage chances of college- and non-college-goers within each stratum. 

    They found that for the least-advantaged men, college reduced the odds of marriage by 38 percent. For the least-advantaged women, that number was 22 percent.

    In comparison, those who came into college with advantages got a marriage boost. Among the highest social stratum, men who attended college increased their likelihood of marriage by 31 percent. Women in the highest social stratum increased their odds by 8 percent.

    "This research demonstrates the importance of differentiating between social background and educational achievement," Musick said. "Educational achievement may go far in reducing income differences between men and women from different social backgrounds, but social and cultural distinctions may persist in social and family relationships."

    You can follow LiveScience senior writer Stephanie Pappas on Twitter @sipappas. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter @livescience and on Facebook.

    What do you feel about this article?

     

    8 comments

    • Joey JoJo Shabadoo  •  Chicago, United States  •  3 months ago
      Disadvantaged people also drop babies at an incredible rate. This plays a huge part in the development of a scholatic career.
    • Scurvy Wafers  •  Phoenix, United States  •  3 months ago
      TRANSLATION: poor? stay barefoot and pregnant. Rich? go to college, get your masters, marry a rich guy to combine your family's wealth, have a kid at 31 and hire a live in nanny to raise it while you climb the ladder of success AND STOP THINKING ABOUT THE DISADVANTAGED, after all, youre not poor, so who cares?
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        that's not what they are saying at all... they are saying that if you were poor, then got an education, you don't want to marry another poor person. sounds like your angry about something.
      • Scurvy Wafers 3 months ago
        so essentially from your perspective the way YOU understand it, if a poor person had the opportunity to get an education(an absolute RARITY anymore, as most poor people need to WORK 70 hrs a week just to survive, who has time or MONEY FOR SCHOOL?), he/she would shun a relationship with someone who's economic situation wasnt as favorable as their own. i had a girlfriend whose mother drilled into her head: 'never marry for love, only marry for money', and your point illustrates this prejudice perfectly. if i sound angy it is because of the injustice the working class of this country must endure on a daily basis: outsourcing, wage cuts, globalization, layoffs, etc. do the uber class ever see a minute of struggle? THEY ARE THE VERY PEOPLE WHO FORCE THE MIDDLE CLASS TO TAKE THE HITS. rather than accept a smaller bonus and spread some cheer company wide, what does Hewlitt Packard do? they lay off 700 people so the share prices can increase and pay their top managers millions in bonus packages. meanwhile the people who are in the trenches peddling their products and answering their phones get pink slips? this is the american capitalist system? and to listen to people like you try to make excuses for these farcical psuedo-news articles is anything but amusing. you dont get it, you never will get it, so why bother to try? as long as you have cable tv, a new car to drive and your kids go to private schools you need not concern yourself with the plight of your struggling neighbors. after all, its not your concern, they must be stupid for being poor, otherwise they wouldnt be poor, and you just numb yourself with temporary distractions to keep that sense of charity as far from your pyssyche as possible
    • Chachi  •  3 months ago
      Unfortunately, it doesn't stop them from having children, thereby racking up more debt and statistically hurting the child's chances, thus perpetuating the cycle.
    • Dave  •  Rockwood, United States  •  3 months ago
      More liberal anti marriage crap.
    • Time waits for no slave  •  3 months ago
      Translation;If you are poor and a man with no education,you will be a lonely dude,if your a woman and look attractive and spread your legs to the right guy with an education.You can live a good life.
    • dr know  •  3 months ago
      disadvantage background = brothers. brothers feel marriage is a trap, reguardless the level of education.
    • Diane  •  3 months ago
      this is really old news. looking back thru history also gives us a clue or two about this. royalty/nobility married each other. it was not until recently (historically speaking) that we realized the pitfalls and consequences of inbreeding. now the royals marry the commoners (note the last several royal weddings worldwide) to prevent birth defects and use prenups instead. we have had this behavior since recorded history and probably before recorded history, in every culture, race, religion, creed, etc. and it still exists today and everywhere else too. think caste system in india, to name the first that comes to mind. google if you have further questions.
    • Ulfheonar  •  Gainesville, United States  •  3 months ago
      "disadvantaged backgrounds"??? Just like "Teens" and "Youths" are the new PC buzz words for blacks. Every single time I read "Youths,"..... I know it's a black.
      • Amanda 3 months ago
        You have nothing to say about the subject of the article? There are white people who grew up in poverty just as there are black people who grew up in poverty.
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Search

    News for You

    • Australian tycoon 'is world's richest woman'
      Australian tycoon 'is world's richest woman'

      Australia's richest person Gina Rinehart has eclipsed Wal-Mart heiress Christy Walton to become the world's wealthiest woman, according to an annual index by Business Review Weekly.

    • Donald Driver & Peta Murgatroyd Win Dancing With The Stars
      Donald Driver & Peta Murgatroyd Win Dancing With The Stars

      They called it "the most competitive season" ever on "Dancing with the Stars," but on Tuesday night, just one pair was good enough for Season 14 mirrorball glory.

    • Chinese couple bury woman alive, sparking outrage

      BEIJING (Reuters) - Chinese police have arrested a young couple who buried an old woman alive believing she was dead after their car hit the 68-year-old, newspapers said on Thursday, in a case which has sparked outrage over declining public morality. The couple had been at an all-night karaoke session when they hit the woman while driving in the early hours of the morning in the wealthy eastern province of Zhejiang last month, the official China Daily said. "A witness said he heard someone crying …

    • US climber describes deadly congestion on Everest
      US climber describes deadly congestion on Everest

      An American adventurer who helped rescue four climbers from Mount Everest last weekend has told of how a crowded push for the summit and bad weather created deadly conditions for mountaineers.

    • American Idol Finale Recap: Phillip Phillips & Jessica Sanchez Battle It Out
      American Idol Finale Recap: Phillip Phillips & Jessica Sanchez Battle It Out

      "American Idol" returned to the Nokia Theatre L.A. Live on Tuesday as Jessica Sanchez and Phillip Phillips battled it out for the title. The two contenders couldn't have been more different - Jessica Sanchez, the 16-year-old with the big, big voice, and Phillip Phillips, the 21-year-old bashful singer with a soulful edge. Here's how the finale went down:

    • Queen told William to rip up wedding guest list
      Queen told William to rip up wedding guest list

      Queen Elizabeth II told her grandson Prince William to rip up the guest list he was given for his wedding and do it again himself to include his friends, he said in an interview.

    • Sharon Stone sued for harassment by former nanny
      Sharon Stone sued for harassment by former nanny

      LOS ANGELES (TheWrap.com) - Sharon Stone's basic instinct might be a little bit off - at least when it comes to how to treat the help. "Casino" actress Stone is being sued by a woman claiming to be her former nanny, who says that Stone made disparaging remarks about her ethnicity and religious beliefs, and illegally fired her for receiving rightfully obtained overtime pay. Erlinda T. Elemen claims that she began working for Stone in October 2006, and was promoted to head nanny of the actress' three …