Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Who Owns the Moon Camera? U.S. Government vs. Apollo Astronaut

    If the government throws a camera away on the moon and an astronaut then picks it up and saves it, does it become his to own and sell?

    That's more or less the question to which the U.S. government is seeking a federal court answer in the case "United States of America vs. Edgar Mitchell," which was filed in Miami last Wednesday (June 29).

    The lawsuit, which names the sixth man to walk on the moon as the defendant, asks the court to declare a movie camera that was used during the 1971 Apollo 14 mission as the "exclusive property of the United States."

    After returning to Earth with the camera and having it in his possession for the past four decades, Mitchell, 80, attempted to sell it last month through a New York auction house. The camera, which was estimated to sell for between $60,000 and $80,000, was withdrawn before its sale could proceed.

    According to the lawsuit, which was filed by Asst. U.S. Attorney Christopher Macchiaroli on behalf of NASA, the government made "multiple requests" for Mitchell to return the camera "and no response [was] provided."

    From the moon to the Earth

    To understand why the camera's ownership is now being contested, one must first appreciate how it ended up back on Earth.

    The 6-inch long by 4-inch high by 2-inch thick (15 by 10 by 5 cm) Data Acquisition Camera (DAC) was one of two 16 mm motion picture cameras aboard the Apollo 14 lunar module "Antares" when it landed on the moon on Feb. 5, 1971. Used to record engineering data, terrain and lunar surface photography, this particular camera was mounted inside, looking out the right window on Mitchell's side of the lander. [Top 10 Apollo Hoax Theories]

    The camera shot the final five minutes of Antares' landing, as Mitchell's crewmate, commander Alan Shepard, piloted the spacecraft to a touchdown on the moon's Fra Mauro Highlands.

    After more than 33 hours on the surface, including two moon walks and a couple of swings with a makeshift golf club, Shepard and Mitchell blasted off the moon, the camera still on board.

    The mission plan called for the DAC to be left in Antares to save weight aboard the command module "Kitty Hawk," the capsule that would return the astronauts to Earth. The lunar module and all its contents would be left to slam back onto the moon just a day later.

    Mitchell however, had other plans. In addition to various other spacesuit and spacecraft hardware that Shepard and he saved from being smashed to smithereens, Mitchell moved the camera to the command module for the ride home.

    "In addition to taking the data out of it, the tape, I brought the camera itself back too," Mitchell told WPTV, the NBC-Affiliate near his home in Palm Beach, Fla.

    Mission mementos

    The Apollo 14 astronauts were not the only crewmates to salvage parts of their lunar module as mementos. Almost all the others did the same.

    The Apollo 13 crew was instructed by Mission Control to salvage spare parts from that mission's moon lander. A mid-flight explosion famously ended in the moon landing being canceled, and the landing module's mementos helped compensate for the missing weight that was to have been made up by moon rocks.

    But a problem was not necessary for others to bring home unplanned souvenirs.

    Astronauts aboard Apollo 12 and Apollo 15 ripped off parts of their moonwalking suits' life support backpacks before they were discarded onto the lunar surface. Others saved their module's joystick hand controllers, as well as netting used to restrain equipment and support cables.

    NASA didn't need these makeshift mementos to return to Earth. In some cases, such as the camera brought back by Mitchell, the agency's plan was to have it deposited at the bottom of an impact crater created when the moon lander crashed down onto the moon's surface.

    Just the same, the astronauts asked their bosses at the Manned Spacecraft Center — now called the Johnson Space Center — in Houston for permission to keep the items they returned, along with other souvenirs such as their personal hygiene kits and the checklists they followed to navigate to and from the moon.

    "We had an agreement with NASA management, that small items that didn't exceed our weight limitations, we could bring back," Mitchell told WPTV.

    A few memos reside today in the NASA history archives describing some of the types of items that the astronauts desired and could keep, but no formal property transfer was apparently drafted. A September 1972 interview with Donald "Deke" Slayton, head of NASA's astronaut corps at the time of Apollo 14, states that an inventory of every spacecraft part to be returned as a memento was created ahead of the mission launching.

    "They give me a list of things they're going to bring back," Slayton, who died in 1993, told the Tucson Daily Citizen. "I give it to the program office and they bring 'em back."

    Anything registered on the list was considered "legal" for the astronauts to keep, but Slayton insisted on restricting the list to the astronauts' eyes only. "It's the astronauts' personal business," he told the newspaper.

    Of course at the time, the mementos were just that: items placed on the mantle and in some cases, loaned by the astronauts to museums. No one considered the financial value of the flown-to-the-moon artifacts.

    Continue reading at collectSPACE.com about the government’s claim and what astronaut Edgar Mitchell thinks of the lawsuit against him.

    Follow collectSPACE on Facebook and Twitter @collectSPACE and editor Robert Pearlman @robertpearlman. Copyright 2011 collectSPACE.com. All rights reserved.

    What do you feel about this article?

     

    16 comments

    • A Yahoo! User  •  10 months ago
      Since the entire moon is property of Russia, and the camera hit Russia soil. The camera righfully belongs to Russia. First man made object to ever be placed on moon was Russian hence entire moon is now Russian territory.
      • Bellissimo Pizza 10 months ago
        Laughing, We gave the Moon to the Chechens after the Camera was lifted by astroretard and will be sent into the gulag system

        These Chechens are lucky there is not a Gulag system reinstated, but this maybe the future home of this population is they do not learn how to behave nicely.
      • A Yahoo! User 10 months ago
        This is good idea for labor force for moon development, send Chechens in as expendable labor force for Russian moon base.
      • dave 10 months ago
        has russia ever set foot on the moon, even to this day??? NOT
    • ronald  •  10 months ago
      If NASA can't have it,nobody can have it.Try stealing material out of a company dumpster and see what happens.
      • Dismayed Moderate 10 months ago
        Sad how right you are. A year or two ago, where I work, they were clearing out a storage space and due to lack of other space, threw out several desks, chairs, dry-erase-boards, etc. One of my co-workers salvaged a small dry erase board for use in our area, and was on the receiving end of a 3rd degree grilling over it, even though it wasn't leaving the company, and is probably the one that would have been set up had we known it was available, and requested it as little as a week earlier.
    • Jessica  •  10 months ago
      Its exactly the action you would expect from the US Government. If the camera was worthless, meaning it wouldn't sell on ebay for a penny, they wouldn't care... but because it is likely worth that much, now its a "possession" and they want it back. I can understand the astronaut didn't "ask" to keep it like others had done, but it wasn't supposed to ever come back to Earth so it had no value to NASA anyway. Kinda of like your garbage once it hits the curb, its public to everyone.
    • Tom  •  10 months ago
      First of all, the camera DOES NOT belong to the U.S. government. It belongs to the people, us. Mitchell paid taxes! Let him have it, after all he paid for it! This is like the guys who find sunken treasure. No government does anything to recover lost treasure until someone else does all the work and discovers it. Then they say it's theirs.
      • HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS SUBC ... 10 months ago
        Best wishes on your thinking, It does belong to the US Government, it cannot be sold as profit, he did not pay for it, It like the Military retired officer saying he owns the weapons he used to kill people. You can salvage US Government property for profit it is done daily, except for retards like Astroboy. Sunken treasure you also apply for salvage rights and it can be contested in any Court in the world. I pay taxes also. I do not say the camera belongs to me unless I purchased it.
      • Micro . 10 months ago
        Gee, that would mean I'm entitled to all those tanks, ships, planes and everything else the government is holding for me, because I pay taxes.
    • kozz  •  10 months ago
      If you throw something away, it's no longer yours, and anyone has the right to salvage it.
    • 6th Gear  •  10 months ago
      Let's strap Asst. U.S. Attorney Christopher Macchiaroli's %%% to the top of a Saturn S-IVB rocket and send him to the moon and back then see what he does with a camera. This, as Tom Hanks said in Apollo 13, "this is....%$#$%%%#$#!" Let the man have the camera. NASA should have bigger fish to fry. Let's go back to the moon or try for Mars.
    • Bronx Cheer  •  10 months ago
      The governement wants it back because it is proof positive there never was a lunar landing. It all took place in the Arizona desert and it is one of the Governments greatest conspiracies. I heard there is actually a Ford Pinto that can be seen in the background if you look closely. FINALLY, the truth comes out! YES!!!!
      • Carley 10 months ago
        You heard there was a Ford Pinto, but did you bother to look for the proof? so, how can you say it is the truth?
      • Karmalious 10 months ago
        Another retard posting... go do some research..
      • Don R 10 months ago
        I would go MUCH further than RETARD!
    • Carley  •  10 months ago
      If they had left it there, the Russians might own it.
    • HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS SUBC ...  •  10 months ago
      It is like asking why the President cannot sell the Whitehouse because the administration no longer wants it.

      Simple as it is, you cannot make profit from Government Items not "owned by you".
      The manned spaceflight center never owned the Camera, the US Government does and always did own the property. Mitchell could have gone the salvage for profit process but choose to act like a special education person. I think of him as retarded as well as his bosses
      • Karmalious 10 months ago
        if you would have read the article, it says very clearly there was a list created and apparently approved. With a name like House Appropriations Subc...committee.... its no wonder you folks dont read the laws you sign into action.

        "They give me a list of things they're going to bring back," Slayton, who died in 1993, told the Tucson Daily Citizen. "I give it to the program office and they bring 'em back."

        Anything registered on the list was considered "legal" for the astronauts to keep, but Slayton insisted on restricting the list to the astronauts' eyes onl"
      • HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS SUBC ... 10 months ago
        The list is not approved by GSA and the Camera was NOT on the list. This is why current astronaut bring "personal property" as personal effects.

        I read the article, so read it again, I read with I sign, it appears you have selective reading and memory!
        According to the lawsuit, which was filed by Asst. U.S. Attorney Christopher Macchiaroli on behalf of NASA, the government made "multiple requests" for Mitchell to return the camera "and no response [was] provided."

        A few memos reside today in the NASA history archives describing some of the types of items that the astronauts desired and could keep, but no formal property transfer was apparently drafted. A September 1972 interview with Donald "Deke" Slayton, head of NASA's astronaut corps at the time of Apollo 14, states that an inventory of every spacecraft part to be returned as a memento was created ahead of the mission launching.

        Typical for the manned space center of corruption. The DAC was not on any list for astroretard to keep as his property.
    • Atomik Dawg  •  10 months ago
      DON'T BE a "crybaby" uncle sam..the "finders keepers" rule OR the "trash picker" clause SHOULD apply...one man's trash....EXACTLY ! LMFAO Rus Domo.."if" only it were that simple I beleive that "human" trumps "trash"...CHECKMATE "comrade" !
    • Bellissimo Pizza  •  10 months ago
      astroretartedboy can purchase the camera from here;
      Government Sales and Auctions by Agency: USA.gov
    • Buck Nasty  •  10 months ago
      We went to the moon people get over it. They want that camera back because it would show the pictures that were sent back were altered and distorted so you couldn't see the real detail.Did you ever wonder why those pictures were so crappy that came from the top of the line camera system?
    • Robert  •  10 months ago
      I'm surprised they didn't just levy a 100% tax on it like they are trying to put on everything else.
    • My opinion  •  10 months ago
      What is on the camera they don't wany us to see. Pic's of the arizona desert maybe? :)
    • Horace  •  10 months ago
      Garbage by the Government is Government garbage and is owned by the Government. To take the garbage for personal gain is a violation subject to dismissal. To the moon rocks that say we never went to the moon, wake up!
    • Benjamin  •  10 months ago
      nasa do not own anything, We the tax payer own what we pay for. Gov need stop pissing down everybody's throat If they throw away the camera too bad, moon does not belong toanyone, just earth. Why would they want to put garbage up there? Look at the damages they done to earth now, Who's going to pay for that? We the tax payer do, people just don't give a shit now days
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Search

    News for You

    • 'Disoriented' passenger subdued on flight in Miami

      An apparently "disoriented" passenger had to be calmed down and subdued on an American Airlines jet Friday as it was taxiing after landing in Miami International Airport, an airline spokesman said.

    • Alaskan crews gear up to tackle Japan tsunami debris

      ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Reuters) - Cleanup workers will soon attack a jumble of debris from Japan's 2011 tsunami that litters an Alaskan island, as residents in the state gear up to scour their shores for everything from buoys to building material that has floated across the Pacific. The cleansing project slated to start on Friday on Montague Island is expected to last a couple weeks, and organizers say it marks the first major project in Alaska to collect and dispose of debris from the tsunami. The March …

    • James and Durant headline All-NBA selections

      (Reuters) - Most Valuable Player LeBron James of the Miami Heat and top scorer Kevin Durant of the Oklahoma City Thunder headlined the list of players selected for the All-NBA team, the league said on Thursday.

    • Chinese couple bury woman alive, sparking outrage

      BEIJING (Reuters) - Chinese police have arrested a young couple who buried an old woman alive believing she was dead after their car hit the 68-year-old, newspapers said on Thursday, in a case which has sparked outrage over declining public morality. The couple had been at an all-night karaoke session when they hit the woman while driving in the early hours of the morning in the wealthy eastern province of Zhejiang last month, the official China Daily said. "A witness said he heard someone crying …

    • Apple CEO gives up $75 million in dividend income
      Apple CEO gives up $75 million in dividend income

      SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Apple Inc Chief Executive Tim Cook will not be earning dividend income on the more than 1 million shares to which he is entitled, which will cost him about $75 million. Apple said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday that Cook had asked to be excluded from a recently instituted company program through which employees can accumulate dividends on their restricted stock units that are still vesting. Asked why Cook was doing this, Apple declined …

    • Iran navy saves US freighter from pirates: report
      Iran navy saves US freighter from pirates: report

      Iran's navy said Thursday it saved an American-flagged cargo ship that was being attacked by pirates in the Gulf of Oman.

    • Mexican mother arrested after son's eyes gouged out
      Mexican mother arrested after son's eyes gouged out

      MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - A mother in Mexico has been arrested on suspicion of gouging out the eyes of her 5-year-old son during a ceremony. Police said on Thursday they had arrested seven people, including the boy's parents, after his eyeballs were pulled out during the ritual in Nezahualcoyotl, a working-class neighborhood on the eastern flank of Mexico City. "There was some kind of ceremony inside a house," said Laura Uribe, a spokeswoman for state prosecutors in the State of Mexico, a populous …