The Canadian Press

Lawyer for Shawn Brant incredulous after publication ban reinstated

Fri Jul 18, 6:30 PM

By Joshua Clipperton, The Canadian Press

TORONTO - The lawyer for a protester at the centre of a court proceeding stemming from the blockade of Highway 401 during last summer's aboriginal day of action said Friday he was incredulous after Crown lawyers successfully reinstated a publication ban on his client's preliminary hearing.

Shawn Brant was arrested and charged with a variety of offences following the incidents of June 29, 2007, when he and other First Nations protesters blocked Canada's busiest highway as well as the CN Rail corridor between Toronto and Montreal near Deseronto, Ont.

Brant's lawyer Peter Rosenthal called a news conference Friday in hopes of adding to details that were made public earlier in the day when a judge in Napanee, Ont., lifted a publication ban on his client's preliminary hearing.

However, the ban was reinstated later Friday when the Ontario Court of Appeal granted a temporary stay of the decision to lift it.

"It's quite amazing, the lengths to which the Crown is going to stop the public from finding out what happened at that preliminary inquiry," Rosenthal said.

Media outlets that had been carrying details previously covered by the ban were forced to withdraw their coverage when it was reinstated by a judge Friday afternoon.

Rosenthal said there was no indication in Napanee court that the Crown would seek to delay the lifting of the publication ban.

He also said media outlets were informed before he was that the publication ban was back on.

"One would have thought that if (the Crown) could notify the media of that, they could have sent me a notice of that as well," he said.

Rosenthal said his client waived his right to a publication ban in the hearing, but the Crown argued it was required for a fair trial.

"In my view there is no merit to any claim that it is protecting a fair trial," Rosenthal said.

He went on to say it's obvious the Crown did not want details of the preliminary hearing to be made public.

"The reason to suppress it is because they're concerned about what will come out of the transcripts," Rosenthal said. "That's the only possible reason to suppress it."

An official with Ontario's Ministry of the Attorney General said the temporary stay is in effect until Wednesday, when the Appeal Court will hear a full stay application from the Crown.

LIKE IT?  LET OTHERS KNOW

Be the first to recommend - Sign in now


See what other people are recommending - Popular Stories