Was it justified to fire three firefighters over sexist behaviour?

Was it justified to fire three firefighters over sexist behaviour?

Comments deemed to be sexist made online by Toronto firefighters have cost three men their jobs, which has in turn led some to question exactly who benefits from the firings.

The Canadian Press reports that Toronto Fire Chief Jim Sales says an investigation found a "pattern" of inappropriate social media use that breached city policies.

"The Toronto public service fosters a corporate culture that sets the highest standard of integrity, professionalism and ethical behaviour. It is our expectation all employees demonstrate and uphold these core values," he said.

The comments in question were made on Twitter, and included some references to quotes from popular a television show.

Another tweet asked if swatting a woman in the head was "considered abuse or a way to reset the brain.”

[ Related: Toronto firefighters fired over inappropriate tweets: fire chief ]

The Toronto Professional Fire Fighters' Association strongly opposed the firings and said the system was not improved by the termination of three members.

"These terminations neither address the specific issues that have been raised nor do they promote the alleged objectives of the fire service," reads a statement.

Sales responded by saying it was a matter of public trust.

In light of the firings, we ask: Was it appropriate or unjustified to fire three firefighters over sexist comments made online?