Maha Govt Blocks CBI From Probing Cases in State Without ‘Consent’

The Uddhav Thackeray-led Maharashtra government on Wednesday, 21 October, revoked the "general consent" given to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe cases in the state.

The investigation agency will now need the approval of the state government to initiate a probe on a case by case basis.

Before Maharashtra, three other Opposition-ruled states – Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and West Bengal – had withdrawn its general consent to let the CBI investigate cases in their states.

Officials told Hindustan Times that this move won’t affect the CBI investigation in the Sushant Singh Rajput case since it was mandated by Supreme Court and is not under the ambit of the general consent of the state.

Also Read: Is CBI FIR the End of Mumbai Police’s Investigation of Fake TRPs?

The UP Police had earlier registered a case in Lucknow's Hazratganj Police Station on the basis of a complaint by one ‘Golden Rabbit Communications’. The case was handed over to the CBI by the UP government.

"The CBI has registered a case at the request of the UP government and following a notification from the government of India about taking over the investigation of the case earlier registered by Hazratganj police station in Lucknow," a senior CBI officer, associated with the case told IANS.

The alleged TRP scam is also being probed by the Mumbai Police, with Republic TV being the biggest name that has surfaced in the case. Two other smaller regional channels named are Fakt Marathi and Box Cinema.

Why Does CBI Need Permission of State to Probe a Case?

The key thing to remember when it comes to this is that police and public order are issues that fall within the purview of state governments, not the Centre, according to the Constitution.

The Centre only controls the police in Union territories (and Delhi) and in connection with the Railways – otherwise investigation of cases is generally supposed to rest with state governments.

However, while the CBI is considered a central investigative agency, it was not constituted by an Act of Parliament like the NIA. Instead, the CBI was founded under a Delhi government law called the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act 1946 (DSPE Act).

This means, unlike the NIA, which can take up a case dealing with its scheduled offences (basically terror cases) anywhere in the country without the consent of the state government in question, the CBI can’t just operate wherever it wants, even in cases dealing with its core competencies, like anti-corruption, or foreign exchange violations.

Section 6 of the DSPE Act says that the CBI cannot:

To prevent this from becoming a logistical nightmare, most states issue a ‘general consent’ to the CBI to investigate cases assigned to them – Rajasthan had done so as far back as 1956.

What’s the 'TRP Scam’ All About?

The matter has also gone to the courts, with the Bombay High Court on Monday asking the Mumbai Police to issue summons to Arnab Goswami if he is proposed to be named as accused in the TRP scam case. The court was informed by Senior Advocate Harish Salve, appearing for Goswami, that he will appear and cooperate with the probe if he receives the summons.

Earlier this month, the Mumbai Police had said that it has busted a "TRP scam", whereby Television Rating Points (TRPs) were being manipulated. In the briefing, the Mumbai Police Commissioner Parambir Singh said that ratings by the Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC), which measures television ratings in India, have been manipulated.

The police named Republic TV and two other Marathi channels who, it said, were involved in the practice.

Also Read: Arnab Goswami and TRP Case: All There Is to Know in 300 Seconds

. Read more on India by The Quint.Sunday View: The Best Weekend Opinion Reads, Curated Just For YouMaha Govt Blocks CBI From Probing Cases in State Without ‘Consent’ . Read more on India by The Quint.