When Sean Strang walks down the streets of the Merritt, B.C., he says people come up to him and ask if they are safe from future flooding.
And he has to tell them: no.
"If this happens again, are we protected? And we are not," Strang told CBC News in an interview.
Strang, finance chief of the City of Merritt's Recovery Operations Centre, is part of the team that has developed a comprehensive flood recovery plan to protect the community against future flooding disasters, following the 2021 atmospheric river event that led to the city's evacuation and damaged more than 600 houses, 300 of which required extensive repairs or demolition.
The only issue? No one is stepping up to pay the $90-million price tag, Strang says.
He argues the only level of government with capacity to pay for a project of this size is the federal government.
Diking work needed
In November 2021, heavy rains flooded communities throughout the Interior and the Lower Mainland — including Merritt, 127 kilometres west of Kelowna, home to about 7,000 people.
Since then, Merritt has been working to repair local infrastructure to get people back into their homes, and developing a plan to protect the city from future floods.
Joanne Street, whose home is located in a trailer park on the banks of the Coldwater River, beside a temporary dyke set up by the military, says she would like to see a more permanent solution to feel safe.
"It's not over," Street said, standing outside of her damaged trailer.
"We are still struggling a lot of us here … it's traumatic still."
Strang says their plan involves permanent diking at an estimated price tag of $90 million.
Limited funding options
While the provincial and federal governments have provided funding to build back to pre-flood levels, the money for mitigation work doesn't seem available, Strang says.
He says when the city decided to apply for the federal Disaster Mitigation and Adaptation Fund, they discovered the next intake had been postponed indefinitely.
And while the province has launched a $81.8-million program aimed at helping First Nations and municipalities prepare and adapt to climate-related flooding, that amount doesn't even cover the cost of the flood mitigation work needed in Merritt.
Emergency Management B.C. said in a statement that it continues to be in talks with the federal government, "as large scale flood mitigation projects will require cost-sharing ... to aid in community recovery efforts."
In a separate statement, Infrastructure Canada said the federal government is taking action on climate-related disasters across the country through a number of other funding programs, and through the development of the National Adaptation Strategy, which is being created in conjunction with provincial, territorial and municipal governments.
Since launching in 2018, more than $2.2 billion has been invested in 72 large-scale infrastructure projects across the country.
"We are investing in preparedness and resilience today, because we know climate change is making these disasters more frequent," said the statement, which did not address the postponement of the infrastructure grant program.
This has left Strang with few options for funding.
"We're kind of left at this point with the federal government saying that they're not willing to fund any sort of mitigation measures all the while they're funding a lot of things in the city that reduce carbon," he said.
A potential alternative
Strang says he has been trying to put together "piecemeal" funding by applying for smaller provincial and municipal grants, but they are not enough to cover the amount of work Merritt needs to become flood-resilient.
"We're looking for a program that funds moving dirt [to build dikes] and buying land and it's not as sexy as the other programs that are out there, but that's what will save the town," he said.
But he hopes an alternative might offer a solution to the city's funding woes: using Merritt as a test case.
Having done extensive research into the costs of the 2021 floods, the city is able to project how much a future flooding disaster would cost. By comparing that to the costs of infrastructure investment, the federal government could decide which projects offer the best value for communities.
"We will monitor this river for a period of 10, 20 years and if it floods again … we can tell you that, 'Hey, we just dodged a $120-million event,' because we have such good costing information," Strang said.
However, the idea hasn't had a lot of traction so far.
"We have everything that we need in terms of engineering to be able to protect ourselves," Strang said, "but we need some senior level government to step up."