Midterm results could give Biden more foreign-policy leeway — and less | Guest Opinion

Though foreign policy played no real role in the outcome of the midterm elections, that outcome matters for foreign policy.

Friends and allies around the world are likely breathing a sigh of relief that the predicted red wave never crashed. Our partners around the globe have been pleased by President Biden’s “America is Back” foreign policy, and all signs point to that direction continuing.

European allies are most concerned about whether robust American support to Ukraine will continue. After all, Congress’ primary power in foreign affairs is allocating or withholding money — the power of the purse. Biden can make a lot of foreign affairs decisions, but if he can’t pay for them, they only mean so much.

Kevin McCarthy, who will become House speaker now that the Republicans have eked out a majority, has already made clear that a Republican-controlled House would not give Ukraine support a “blank check,” even though much of the Republican Party is staunchly behind Ukraine’s fight, as is a majority of the American public. Even if the majority of the House supports Ukraine assistance, McCarthy could choose not to bring it to a vote if part of his caucus strongly opposes it.

This is why the Biden administration has asked Congress to pass a large assistance package during the lame-duck session, while both houses are still under Democratic control. If passed, this will significantly insulate the administration’s policy decisions toward Ukraine in the near term. Since the administration has done a sound job so far balancing U.S. interests and risks involved in this war, that’s good news for U.S. policy.

After Ukraine, the most watched area of U.S. foreign policy is China, but that contentious relationship isn’t likely to change much. The Biden administration’s combative approach is popular on both sides of the aisle, though some in the Republican Party have a knack for escalating negative rhetoric. This may have partly driven Biden’s more measured approach in his recent meeting with Xi Jinping. It won’t get any easier navigating the fine line of competition and cooperation with China with a divided Congress, so the change in tone is welcome.

The midterm results could impact U.S. foreign policy in other important but less obvious ways.

The only place the red wave seemed to hit was Florida. This could actually open up foreign policy options for the Biden administration in Latin America.

Since Florida was considered a critical purple state key to securing the presidency, the state’s powerful Latino constituency has long played an outsized role in the direction of U.S. policy toward Cuba, Venezuela and other Latin American countries. Upsetting this voting bloc was considered politically unwise, but if a Democratic administration has no hope of winning Florida’s electoral votes or Senate seats, that calculation changes, and our relationship with those countries could as well.

The Biden administration today might be more willing to pursue diplomatic and economic engagement in countries there where our bilateral relationships have been strained.

Pay attention to the administration’s reassessment of the relationship with Saudi Arabia, too. After the kingdom slashed oil production in October, considered by many an intentional snub to Biden, administration officials were livid, but hesitant to take major action so close to the midterms.

With the election behind them, Biden’s national-security team might have enough breathing room to confront a longtime partnership with an authoritarian government that hasn’t delivered. A shift with Saudi Arabia could reinvigorate talks with Iran as well, but Iran’s ongoing protests, and subsequent crackdowns, will remain an obstacle to thawing relations there for now.

The most notable and public foreign-policy impact of the new Congress will likely be congressional hearings. A Republican-controlled Congress has previewed the many ways it hopes to be a thorn in Biden’s side, and hosting weeks of hearings to critique Biden’s policy record is high on that list. At a minimum, expect the withdrawal from Afghanistan to be put on public trial, consuming the administration’s time and attention, at the expense of other domestic and foreign policy priorities.

The administration will have less leeway to act than before, but we can expect the United States to remain an active player in the world, continuing its support for allies and for Ukraine’s fight, and maybe just a little less friendly to some of the world’s autocrats. This former diplomat would consider that outcome a midterm win for U.S. foreign policy.

Elizabeth Shackelford is a senior fellow on U.S. foreign policy with the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. She is the author of “The Dissent Channel: American Diplomacy in a Dishonest Age.”

©2022 Chicago Tribune

Shackelford
Shackelford