'No evidence': Researcher behind 'anti-Alberta' inquiry backs off assertion

·1 min read

EDMONTON — A researcher whose work helped prompt Alberta's inquiry into anti-oilsands campaigns seems to have backed away from one of her major allegations.

Vivian Krause says she has never accused U.S. charitable foundations of trying to landlock Canadian oil to specifically benefit American competitors.

In a series of social media posts this week, Krause says she has no evidence of such collusion.

She says her concern is that anti-oilsands campaigns may have unintentionally allowed U.S oil production to increase and didn't benefit the environment.

In a 2016 piece written for the Financial Post, Krause wrote that anti-pipeline activism says it's about climate change but is really about U.S. economic protectionism.

She has also written that she has inquired whether it is legal for U.S. charities to try to influence the price of oil in that country by landlocking Canada's product.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 21, 2021.

The Canadian Press

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. An earlier version included a reference to comments by Premier Jason Kenney.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting