Advertisement

Are Randstad N.V.’s Returns On Capital Worth Investigating?

Today we are going to look at Randstad N.V. (AMS:RAND) to see whether it might be an attractive investment prospect. Specifically, we'll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), since that will give us an insight into how efficiently the business can generate profits from the capital it requires.

Firstly, we'll go over how we calculate ROCE. Then we'll compare its ROCE to similar companies. Finally, we'll look at how its current liabilities affect its ROCE.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What is it?

ROCE measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. All else being equal, a better business will have a higher ROCE. Ultimately, it is a useful but imperfect metric. Renowned investment researcher Michael Mauboussin has suggested that a high ROCE can indicate that 'one dollar invested in the company generates value of more than one dollar'.

How Do You Calculate Return On Capital Employed?

Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

Or for Randstad:

0.16 = €860m ÷ (€11b - €5.0b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2019.)

So, Randstad has an ROCE of 16%.

View our latest analysis for Randstad

Does Randstad Have A Good ROCE?

When making comparisons between similar businesses, investors may find ROCE useful. It appears that Randstad's ROCE is fairly close to the Professional Services industry average of 13%. Independently of how Randstad compares to its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms appears decent, and the company may be worthy of closer investigation.

The image below shows how Randstad's ROCE compares to its industry, and you can click it to see more detail on its past growth.

ENXTAM:RAND Past Revenue and Net Income, January 21st 2020
ENXTAM:RAND Past Revenue and Net Income, January 21st 2020

It is important to remember that ROCE shows past performance, and is not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be misleading for companies in cyclical industries, with returns looking impressive during the boom times, but very weak during the busts. This is because ROCE only looks at one year, instead of considering returns across a whole cycle. Since the future is so important for investors, you should check out our free report on analyst forecasts for Randstad.

Do Randstad's Current Liabilities Skew Its ROCE?

Liabilities, such as supplier bills and bank overdrafts, are referred to as current liabilities if they need to be paid within 12 months. Due to the way ROCE is calculated, a high level of current liabilities makes a company look as though it has less capital employed, and thus can (sometimes unfairly) boost the ROCE. To counter this, investors can check if a company has high current liabilities relative to total assets.

Randstad has total assets of €11b and current liabilities of €5.0b. As a result, its current liabilities are equal to approximately 48% of its total assets. Randstad has a middling amount of current liabilities, increasing its ROCE somewhat.

The Bottom Line On Randstad's ROCE

Randstad's ROCE does look good, but the level of current liabilities also contribute to that. There might be better investments than Randstad out there, but you will have to work hard to find them . These promising businesses with rapidly growing earnings might be right up your alley.

If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of growing companies that insiders are buying.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.