Russian TV journalist defies Putin again and condemns Ukraine war in court
A former state TV journalist charged with discrediting Russia’s armed forces after she staged a protest against the war in Ukraine has been fined for a second time.
Marina Ovsyannikova gained international attention in March after bursting into a studio of Channel One, her then employer, to denounce the Ukraine war during a live news bulletin.
At the time she was fined 30,000 roubles (£403) for flouting protest laws.
Thursday's hearing concerned subsequent social media posts in which she wrote that those responsible for Russia's actions in Ukraine would find themselves before an international tribunal.
Speaking in court, Ovsyannikova defiantly repeated her protest and said she would not retract her words.
"What's going on here is absurd," she said. "War is horror, blood and shame."
Read more: Russian state TV claims the West will 'run out of people' as LGBT population grows
She has now been fined again, and ordered to pay another 50,000 roubles (£672).
The ruling was passed after a short hearing in a Moscow administrative court.
Ovsyannikova rejected the proceedings against her as "absurd".
"The evidence confirms Ovsyannikova's guilt. There is no reason to doubt its authenticity," the judge said.
Ovsyannikova had faced up to 15 years in jail for discrediting the armed forces under a law passed in March, soon after Vladimir Putin launched what he calls his "special military operation" against Ukraine.
Read more: Pro-Russian forces say execution of Brits in Ukraine 'won't be public'
Addressing the court, Ovsyannikova said: "Your accusations are like accusing me of spreading monkeypox," she said. "The purpose of the trial is to intimidate all the people who oppose the war in the Russian Federation."
She described Russia as an aggressor country, saying: "The beginning of this war is the biggest crime of our government."
A lawyer for Ovsyannikova said she had the right to speak out under Article 29 of the Russian constitution which protects the right to freedom of expression, but the judge dismissed the lawyer's arguments.