Supreme Court of Canada affirms 'starting-point' approach to criminal sentencing

·1 min read

OTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada says it is appropriate for appeal courts to set starting-point benchmarks for sentencing offenders in criminal cases.

The high court ruling came today in the cases of two men who received stiffer penalties when Alberta's Court of Appeal ruled that convictions for wholesale fentanyl trafficking should carry a prison sentence of at least nine years.

As a result of the Alberta decision, Cameron O'Lynn Parranto was sentenced to a total of 14 years on various counts including trafficking in fentanyl, while in another case Patrick Felix received 10 years behind bars.

The appeal court noted in the Felix decision that fentanyl trafficking had created a crisis in Alberta and across the country.

In its decision today, a majority of the Supreme Court says starting points are a permissible form of sentencing guidance from appeal courts.

Parranto and Felix had criticized the starting-point approach and argued that sentencing ranges were a preferable means of providing guidance to judges.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 12, 2021.

The Canadian Press

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting