UC Merced community plan does not have enough parks. Revisions are needed | Opinion

The UC Community Plan approved by the City Council in February does not have enough neighborhood parks and includes substandard parks.

The plan covers 654 acres with 3,857 dwellings occupied by 11,100 residents on the south side of UC Merced. The plan shows two parks when seven are needed, according to Merced’s General Plan standards. It should plan for 38.5 acres of neighborhood parks, instead it plans only 12.5 acres split between two neighborhood parks. One of these neighborhood parks is a members only park/club house exclusively for area residents.

The General Plan states that 3.5 acres should be provided in the form of neighborhood parks for each 1,000 residents with the optimum park size established as five acres. Five additional neighborhood parks totaling 26 acres are needed to continue the legacy of outstanding parks for recreation in Merced.

No neighborhood parks are planned in the first three phases of community development, which means 1,500 dwellings with 4,000 residents will be built, yet no neighborhood parks will be developed until 2031 or later. The city plan documents state “The construction of a neighborhood park should occur when the area it will serve reaches about 75% developed.”

The UC Community Plan provides other park open space not in neighborhood parks. A linear park runs along the Fairfield Canal, a primary school has play fields, and a regional sports park is planned with soccer and baseball fields. These do not serve the function/purpose of a neighborhood park, which is 1) to be centrally located in the neighborhood so it is easily accessible to residents,; 2) to include children’s playgrounds; 3) to have tables with a picnic area/facilities; 4) to have basketball/pickleball court; and 5) to have open level play areas for practice football, baseball, soccer etc., all in a well landscaped setting with shade.

These play fields and facilities require adequate space, which is why five acres is recommended. For reference, Bob Carpenter Park is six acres on Parsons Avenue near Yosemite Avenue. The neighborhood park is a gathering place for people who live nearby to recreate and become acquainted, thereby building neighborhood safety and community.

Instead of more neighborhood parks, the UC Community Plan substitutes 39 mini-parks averaging less than half an acre each. These will be expensive to maintain due to the travel time between them and the equipment unloading/loading time for landscape maintenance crews. They will be difficult for police to keep clear of unhoused people sleeping and camping, or from being tagged with graffiti. Some such small parks exist in the city today and the city plan documents state that due to their size, maintenance cost, and limited recreational value, public mini -parks should be discouraged.

These issues with parks in the UC Community Plan were presented by me at the Nov. 15, 2021 City Council hearing on the pre-annexation application, on Aug. 22, 2023 at the Merced County Board of Supervisors hearing on the plan, in meetings with the developer on Dec. 19, 2023 and with the city manager and Recreation Department director on Jan. 10.

At the City Council meeting on Feb. 5 the city manager stated that the plan was going through a “specific plan” process which allowed the development to not conform to city standards, such as for neighborhood parks. He stated that the developer is providing low-cost housing, and in exchange parks may not meet city standards.

One council member supported this exchange. Another council member said it was too late in the process to change the plan for parks.

Revising the plan would take a few months, while the plan will result in substandard neighborhood parks for many years/decades.

Another council member stated there is much park open space on the UC campus and at Lake Yosemite so residents could go there for park recreation, seemingly not understanding the difference between those areas and a neighborhood park purpose/function.

The council approved the plan with the minimum required four votes with two council members absent and council member Fue Xiong voting “no,” stating affordable housing is important but he did not support reducing park facilities in exchange for affordable housing.

Leaders can make changes to the plan if they want it and city staff can find a way to make it happen if directed to do so by the council. The approved plan has a section on how to amend it. Please urge your council members to continue and improve the legacy of many outstanding public parks for Merced by increasing the number of neighborhood parks planned for the UC Community.

Michael Belluomini is a Merced resident and former City Council member.

Michael Belluomini, former Merced City Council member.
Michael Belluomini, former Merced City Council member.