Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Canada Politics

    Stephen Harper’s “Napoleonic plans” in Arctic challenged by Russian writer

    A columnist in Russia is taking exception to Stephen Harper's stance on the Arctic, which asserts Canadian sovereignty over the northern tundra.

    An editorial on the website pravada.ru contends Harper's "Napoleonic plans" are focused on forcing Russia out of the Arctic region.

    "As soon as he arrived in the Arctic, Harper began to observe the (military) exercises attended by land, naval and air forces," wrote Vadim Trukhachev in regards to Harper's visit to the north last week.

    "It is pretty clear who Canada intends to defend itself from. The U.S., Denmark and Norway have access to the Arctic, and they are NATO allies. Only Russia remains."

    Since becoming prime minister Stephen Harper has made annual trips to the Arctic claiming it as a "vital party of our national identity, sovereignty and economic security."

    During his most recent visit, Harper observed the country's largest modern-day Arctic military exercise in an apparent show of force to the international community.

    Other countries, including Russia, have also staked claims to large parts of the mineral and oil-rich Arctic.

    Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has even vowed to "strongly and persistently" defend its interests.

    Despite Putin's strong talk, Trukhachev lashes out at Canada. He cites articles in the Toronto Sun and The Globe and Mail which he says reek of wartime chatter.

    "The local media urges Harper to strengthen Canada's military power in the northern latitudes," he wrote.

    "In its publication back in July, (the) Toronto Sun scared its readers with the Russian threat. The paper stated that the Russians were coming, and were planning to use force. The paper added that Canada was not going to let them do it."

    The writer adds Canada is trying to become a leader in the Arctic using "belligerent rhetoric."

    "The question now is how Russia will respond to the challenge."

    Despite Trukhachev's "rhetoric" most believe the countries involved will be able to settle their disagreements through legal, peaceful means.

    (Reuters Photo)

    What do you feel about this article?

     

    403 comments

    • Tom Kitchen  •  8 months ago
      I am more concerned with a U.S. presense in the arctic than Russia. Why not simply use longitudenal lines that are already on the map to divide the arctic? Oh, right then the U.S. only gets the bit above Alaska. Certainly not enough for so Great and Powerful country with a Manifest Destiny. Good Luck, still waiting for the tanks to roll up to the border and have them ask please.
    • Kurkul  •  8 months ago
      I live by facts not Dreams, What Does Kaczapp Mean? - Russian Murderer. How Did The Soviet Union Begin? By A Country Full Of Hand Out Bums ,Thugs, Alcoholoics, Useless Lazy Garbage. How did they become so big and powerfull, Murder Farmers, Intelligenstva, Journalists, Poets, Educated People, They went into The Ukraine Murdered over 10 Million People, mainly in eastern Ukraine, Moved in all they re KACZAPPS in order to feed They re PARASITE Miki Mouse War Machine, This is exactly what they will do when they get they re hands on Canada, sure you Russian lovers, Oh whats a little piece of Canada, Then how about the rest of Canada. Don`t worry You`ll see.
    • mark  •  8 months ago
      about time we have a leader in Canada who is actually standing up for our sovereignty, not just letting the rest of the world walk all over us.
    • Bob  •  8 months ago
      harpoonie reminds me of another similar style of politician south of our canadian border
    • Kaely Males  •  8 months ago
      People fighting over natural resources. Just sad. Soon the whole world will yun out.
    • Larry  •  8 months ago
      When will you the public begin to realize that oil plus other substances are non-replaceable!
      They do not magically reappear to replenish what is gone.It doesn't matter what country has rights to natural deposits. What does matter is that once these are gone-"they are gone"!
      Russia-The USA-Canada-Norway-!! No country has exclusive rights to what is below the surface. Your comments mean something because they elicit responses,but be more direct and create a dialogue on Twitter or Facebook. I forever questioned my father on his tree-hugger attitude,but tree-huggers and environmentalists around the world are actually right in their believes. They have important views - not just rhetoric.
      Larry said that!!
    • Bud  •  8 months ago
      What a joke! Canada using force against Russia in the arctic????? That's like throwing a grain of rice at a tank. Russia is paranoid, Harper is only protecting the economic interests of the country
    • real guy  •  8 months ago
      They regret Alaska soooooooooo bad, now they want that land that's even in their back yard. Go away, putin!
      • Terry G 8 months ago
        Well, that was very stupidly said.
      • Hairy 8 months ago
        Putin is an evil (good looking) man... damn him to hell!
    • James G  •  8 months ago
      Well what do Canadians expect. The Arctic has always been a place wayyyyyyy up there, and only a few Inuit, lots of frost ice and snow. Now with the warming a lot of attention is being paid to "OUR" North. Remember the abuse of dislocating Inuit ppeoples further north in order to lay claim to a few ice pans? Well this abuse is a matter of historical record. My point is all; at once the Arctic resources have become more accessable, so lets rush for it. Good luck suckers!!!!!.
    • Malcolm of Earth  •  8 months ago
      Hmmm wonder which is better, Harper and his Oil buddies controling the Arctic, or Russia having it... Think I would have to fight on Russia's side for sure on this one. At least I have slightly more faith in Russia on using the area more responsibly. Harper outright ignores scientists about environmental issues. Putin, you can count on my support.
      • Larry 8 months ago
        thumbs up.
        harper will sell it out all the oil and even the ice cubes for their drinks.
        the worst russia would do is open a dance club disco there.. and a warehouse to store mail order brides for faster delivery to fat america
      • Deacon 8 months ago
        You two rocket scientists should be living in Russia...it's way too easy for you here.
    • real guy  •  8 months ago
      Russia is not even close! They better fight back for for Alaska
      • Hairy 8 months ago
        They want any part of the North they'll still be at economic headlock with the USA and Canada!
    • Frank  •  8 months ago
      Wat happen to the CANADIAN borders???????????????
      • A Yahoo! User 8 months ago
        You lose what you can't defend...
      • Hairy 8 months ago
        We take them back Today!!!
    • joe1988  •  8 months ago
      Canada's hopes will turn to iron man.
    • D Flow  •  8 months ago
      I think it should be Canada's only anyways but what can you do?.. heh
      • Malcolm of Earth 8 months ago
        It should be shared by the worlds Nations and used responsibly, especially concerning the environment.
      • Larry 8 months ago
        nah. that chinese dude should buy it for more golf courses and rich person holidays. and to melt it so they can send more goods here from china faster.
        and you cqn have more jobs. thats all you humans care about money jobs and getting stuff. gota have your stuff....
    • Sir Yabba Dabba  •  8 months ago
      Apparently Harper cares about natural resources and welfare of Canadians.
      I personally don’t buy it simply because he is working for international corporations.
      If you ever saw his snake eyes and cynical smile you’d understand why many keep the safe distance. He is the man that sold Canada for good. Russia is by far much stronger militarily than Canada to challenge it and, to be perfectly honest when it comes to strategic resources I wouldn’t count on NATO or US support at all.
    • David P  •  8 months ago
      seriously cant we have one war that isnt about religion i say bring it on
      people are a virus on this planet lock and load fuckers!
    • forex313  •  8 months ago
      Lets not get bullied by russia the way we got bullied by the US in the softwood lumber deal. its our property and there is no reason to believe otherwise. Get out of our backyard you sneaky russians.
    • Lawrence  •  8 months ago
      I the Arctic belongs to Canada then the Russians better keep the hell out. Russia has expanded before as we all know and if they set one damn foot on my property I would expect Harper or any successor to kick their #$%$ Canada is not going to be pushed around. Just because we like to help others doesn't mean we are going to sit there and let someone steal from us. The US coveted our land and John A. MacDonald put a stop to that by building the railroad to the west and sending out the Mounties. We will do the same to any Russians who think they can come take what doesn't belong to them.
    • K.T.  •  8 months ago
      Look back in History, Russia sold their part of the North, now that there is natural resources, there, guess who's back ? Losers, watch out for China, the landgrabbers !
    • Dennis  •  8 months ago
      Come on,,,seriously,,,,,we are Canada for god's sake,,,the north is ours,,want to fight for it??? We kicked everybodys ass in every fight we have been in,,come here and see how we do it,,,there are not many of us but we have never lost,,ask the Germans,or the Japanese,or the Americans

    Blog Authors / Profiles