Dustin Duncan elaborates on how Sask. might remit heating carbon tax money

Dustin Duncan said it would be unfair if Saskatchewan residents had a reduced rebate because of the provincial government’s current plan. (Cory Herperger/CBC - image credit)
Dustin Duncan said it would be unfair if Saskatchewan residents had a reduced rebate because of the provincial government’s current plan. (Cory Herperger/CBC - image credit)

If the province does ultimately decide to remit carbon tax revenue to the federal government, it will pay for it with either the general revenue fund, SaskEnergy earnings or both, the minister responsible for the Crown corporation says.

"All of this could be solved if the prime minister just did the right thing and provide that fairness to all Canadians, including people in Saskatchewan," Dustin Duncan, the minister responsible for SaskEnergy, said during an interview on CBC's Morning Edition on Thursday.

On Tuesday, Duncan said the Saskatchewan government will make it's decision in February on whether to remit the heating gas carbon taxes to Ottawa.

However, Saskatchewan announced last October it would stop collecting the carbon tax on natural gas starting on Jan.1 because of the federal government's decision to pause the tax on home heating oil, which mostly helps Atlantic provinces.

When asked why the provincial government doesn't remove other taxes such as the provincial sales tax, Duncan replied it's about "the principle of fairness" when it comes to the carbon tax.

"We're not asking for any special treatment, we just want to be treated the way that the prime minister has treated one region of the country," Duncan said.

The minister brought up the point of "fairness" again when talking about rebates, saying the federal government didn't clarify whether Atlantic provinces will get rebates or whether they will be reduced.

"If Saskatchewan residents are going to see a reduced rebate because of the plan of the provincial government, then we have another issue of fairness," Duncan said.

"It doesn't appear that Canadians and Atlantic Canada are going to see a reduced rebate because of what the prime minister has done."

He said the provincial government's plan shouldn't have an effect on rebates.

Trevor Tombe, a professor of economics at the University of Calgary, said Duncan misunderstands the federal system.

Trevor Tombe is a professor of economics at the University of Calgary.
Trevor Tombe is a professor of economics at the University of Calgary.

Trevor Tombe, a professor of economics at the University of Calgary, says Duncan seems to misunderstand the federal government's role. (CBC)

"The rebates to not just Atlantic Canada but everywhere will be affected by the exclusion of home heating oil from the backstop system," Tombe said. "It'll predominantly affect Atlantic Canada."

The distinction between Atlantic Canada and Saskatchewan, according to Tombe, is that Saskatchewan is planning on withholding the carbon tax, which would be illegal.

"The federal government naturally would have expectation of receiving the revenue that is owed," Tombe said. "Therefore rebates might not actually be affected even if there is a delay in the actual cash remittance."

Because the money is legally owed to the federal government, Tombe said, they'll likely book it as revenue, even if the actual cash is not received on time.

However, he said, "without question" rebates will be reduced because of the Atlantic exemption.