RCMP union says mass shooting review must tackle 'under-resourced social support system'
The union representing RCMP members says any inquiry into Nova Scotia's mass shooting should look at not only the immediate police response, but also at the gunman's history of domestic abuse and whether he had enough access to mental health supports.
In a news release Tuesday, the National Police Federation called on the governments of Canada and Nova Scotia to make sure a joint federal-provincial inquiry has "sufficient scope" to look at all issues relevant to April's mass shooting.
Union president Brian Sauvé is sending a list of questions to both governments that he said should be included in the "currently undefined scope" of any review to ensure its findings are meaningful and will create change.
"When a tragedy like this occurs, it's short-sighted and insufficient to only look at the hours requiring an urgent police response," Sauvé said in the release.
"If the goal of the review is to identify and understand all contributing factors and prevent future mass tragedies, the review must take a broader approach and look at all timelines and impacts that led to the culminating horrific act."
Union questions
Nova Scotia Justice Minister Mark Furey has said he hopes to share details this week about what the review into the mass killing will look like.
The questions the union would like addressed in the review include:
What other interactions did the shooter have with provincial or federal agencies during their lifespan, and what were the nature of those interactions?
Did the shooter undergo any previous psychiatric assessment, and if so, what was the result or follow-up?
How did the shooter gain access to illegal weapons, their origin and what increased measures need to be put in place to stop illegal weapons from coming into Canada?
Has the shooter ever been charged with any other offences, been subject to any probation ordered by the courts, and was it completed?
Did the shooter have a history of domestic abuse, and how was this addressed by the courts or government agencies?
Were there any services that could have prevented this tragedy which were unavailable due to COVID-19 restrictions?
Has the funding model of the RCMP been reviewed and appropriate budget requests for manpower, training and equipment been implemented? Is there adequate funding to provide the level of service that Nova Scotians want?
Did the shooter have sufficient access to mental health supports and programs throughout his life and what improvements to adequate health supports are needed to improve reach and use?
Given the above, were existing laws and policies under which police operate sufficient to protect the public?
Sauvé said if there are lessons to be learned about preventing or responding to situations like this in the future, the union supports a review to identify those aspects.
But he added it is "woefully inadequate" to only focus on the short period of time when officers are actively pursuing a shooter.
"This approach ignores the factors that led to a high-risk and volatile individual slipping through the cracks of our often chronically under-funded and under-resourced social support system for years," Sauvé said.
'Psychological and sociological elements'
On April 18 and 19, a gunman went on a shooting rampage across central Nova Scotia that left 22 victims dead. It began in the small community of Portapique, and ended about 13 hours and 150 kilometres later at a gas station in Enfield where the gunman was killed by police.
Furey has said that despite committing to an inquiry, the province would not be leading it.
The justice minister has already indicated the review will need to consider other "psychological and sociological elements," such as issues around domestic violence and mental health.
MORE TOP STORIES
